Donald Macintyre's Sketch: George Osborne’s lame pun takes Balls-baiting to a new level

 

Donald Macintyre
Tuesday 28 January 2014 20:31
Comments

Revelling in the latest growth figures, George Osborne lifted Balls-baiting to a new plane. He was asked an unusually long list of super-friendly questions by euphoric Tory backbenchers. Ones that in the secret dreams of the MPs involved, invite the answer: “Yes. My honourable friend has absolutely hit the nail on the head with that spiffing question correctly mentioning our long-term economic plan, allowing me to lay into the Opposition, and qualifying him for early promotion.”

Aidan Burley – braving the Commons after a further unwelcome weekend report that he brought the groom an SS uniform to wear at his Alpine stag party a couple of years ago – celebrated the fall in unemployment in his Cannock Chase constituency.

But Andrew Jones’s was a classic: he asked the Chancellor to “agree that the anti-business rhetoric and measures” of “some” (shorthand for Eds Balls and Miliband) would “destroy that progress”.

To this, Osborne replied: “By being anti-business, they are anti-recovery, anti-jobs, anti-investment and anti-the British people.” Heavens! Not quite Churchill’s “Gestapo” gibe at Labour in the 1945 election. But a bit over-the-top to label a freeze on energy prices and a 50p top rate tax rate as the work of a treacherous fifth column.

This was just a warm-up. So emotionally charged is Treasury Questions that a certain light-headedness sets in at times.

Labour’s Barry Sheerman promised the Chancellor to welcome improvements in the economy “if he stops blaming the whole economic world meltdown on the previous Labour government”. Osborne said this was “the first time in years” Sheerman had defended Gordon Brown. Sheerman laughed long and merrily, rather confirming the accuracy of Osborne’s remark.

But this did not deflect Osborne from reciting a list of Balls’ gloom-laden predictions about the economy – confounded, as the Chancellor saw it, by the news on growth – before producing the day’s most excruciating pun, popular as it was on the Tory benches. “He has been wrong on all these things. What the Opposition need are new crystal balls.” A sardonic Balls retorted acidly: “Very good, Chancellor – a joke about my name being Balls. Fabulous.”

So not the easiest day for the shadow Treasury team. But Balls is too experienced not to clutch at a passing raft. And it was that “the Prime Minister and the Mayor of London are now saying that they want to cut the top rate of income tax again, to 40p”. Not quite accurate in Cameron’s case, since he ducked the question on Monday. But that wasn’t the point, which was to demand: “Come on, George – stand up and rule it out.” Something Osborne’s long answer denouncing Labour’s 50p top rate omitted to do. Which means we will be hearing more of this unless and until he does.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in