1 in 7 single parents looking for work hit by DWP benefits sanctions

Charity warns single parents are being unfairly targeted

On Wednesday Theresa May rejected calls to launch an inquiry into family courts granting access to parents with known histories of abuse
On Wednesday Theresa May rejected calls to launch an inquiry into family courts granting access to parents with known histories of abuse

One in seven of all single parents looking for work over the last decade have had their income interrupted due to benefit sanctions, new research shows.

An analysis of Department for Work and Pensions figures by the charity Gingerbread found that more than 209,000 single parents claiming Jobseekers’ Allowance had had their benefit payments stopped in the last 10 years. Many were referred for sanctions more than once, with nearly 436,000 referrals in total.

The charity says the DWP has been significantly underestimating the number of single parent families it is sanctioning because its preferred monthly metric “underestimates the risk faced by those on JSA for longer than a month”.

The DWP’s monthly rate used to estimate the impact on single parents is 6 per cent, but the charity says the real, more reflective figure is at around double that.

Sumi Rabindrakumar, research officer at Gingerbread, said single parents “increasingly feel punished for being unable to juggle seeking work and looking after their children” and called for a full review of the sanctions system.

“These are sobering findings, at a time when the government is dramatically increasing the reach of sanctions through welfare reform,” she said.

“All the evidence suggests that a system that is supposed to help people out of poverty all too often unfairly strips away vital financial support from those who need it most.

“Unfair sanctions put families under severe strain and waste government resources. The government can no longer afford to put off a proper review of the sanctions system.”

The Gingerbread report calculates that “the intensification of conditionality rules over the past decade” has meant that “single parents are now more likely to end up with a sanction than in the past”.

Some 32 per cent of single parents’ sanctions are appealed, compared to 26 per cent of other JSA sanctions. In both cases the majority of appeals are successful, with 62 per cent of sanctions against single parents brought to appeal found to be unfair.

A report by the National Audit Office released at the end of 2016 found that benefit sanctions were ineffective and plunged claimants into hardship, hunger and depression.

The DWP said in response to the report that sanctions were “an important part of our benefits system”. A DWP spokesperson said: “We do not recognise these figures. The reality is only around 1 per cent of lone parents on JSA are sanctioned each month, and they are less likely to be sanctioned than other groups.

“We are committed to helping lone parents into a job that fits in around their caring responsibilities, and the employment rate for lone parents is now the highest it’s ever been.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in