EU rejects Philip Hammond’s bid to include financial services in Brexit trade deal

The Chancellor said including financial services in the deal was in everyone's 'mutual interest'

Jon Stone
Brussels
Thursday 08 March 2018 18:04
Comments
The agency is currently based in Canary Wharf in London
The agency is currently based in Canary Wharf in London

The European Union has rejected the Chancellor’s bid to include an unprecedented section on financial services in the post-Brexit trade deal, warning that “life will be different” for banks once Britain leaves.

Philip Hammond on Wednesday told an audience in the City of London that “sceptics” of including financial services in a free trade deal were wrong and that such an approach was not only “possible” but “in our mutual interest”.

But speaking in Dublin on Thursday Donald Tusk, the president of the European Council, directly rebuffed Mr Hammond’s call, hinting that the UK’s impending departure from the single market, customs union, and jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice made such an approach difficult.

“Yesterday the UK Chancellor made a speech in the City of London arguing for a bespoke deal or an ambitious FTA covering financial services – so I will refer to this issue of such great interest to London,” he said.

“In the free trade agreement we can offer trade in goods, with the aim of covering all sectors, subject to zero tariffs and no quantitative restrictions.

“But services are not about tariffs. Services are about common rules, common supervision and common enforcement.

‘To ensure a level playing field, to ensure the integrity of the single market, and to ensure financial stability, this is why we cannot offer the same in services as we can in goods. It’s also why FTAs don’t have detailed rules for financial services.

“We should all be clear that also when it comes to financial services, life will be different after Brexit.”

Mr Tusk also rejected the Chancellor’s claim that it would be in the EU’s “mutual interest” with Britain to do a deal on such services.

“I fully respect the Chancellor’s competence in defining what is in the UK’s interest but he must allow us to define what is in the EU’s interest,” he said.

UK financial institutions can currently do business on the continent without setting up a subsidiary by way of EU “passporting rights” that give them access to EU markets. The EU has said those rights will end after Brexit, while EU officials have rebuffed City financiers who have proposed workarounds.

EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier has previously said that “On financial services, UK voices suggest that Brexit does not mean Brexit. Brexit means Brexit, everywhere”.

Over 5,400 British firms rely on passporting rights to bring in £9bn in revenue every year to Britain. The British Bankers’ Association (BBA) has said the loss of passporting would be “disruptive, costly and time-consuming”.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in