EU referendum: David Cameron accused of 'loading debate' to encourage UK to stay in union

Senior Tories have criticised plans that would allow ministers to use the weight of Government to support the campaign for a Yes vote right up to polling day

Oliver Wright
Sunday 07 June 2015 07:08
Comments
David Cameron has been accused of attempting to “load” the European Union referendum debate
David Cameron has been accused of attempting to “load” the European Union referendum debate

David Cameron has been accused by two of his former cabinet ministers of an “unwise and completely unacceptable” attempt to “load” the European Union referendum debate in a way that could favour Britain’s continued membership.

The former Environment Secretary Owen Paterson and the former Defence Secretary Liam Fox criticised plans that would allow ministers to use the weight of Government to swing behind the campaign for a Yes vote right up to polling day.

The plans are contained in the Government’s EU Referendum Bill, which is due to have its second reading on 9 June. They propose that a ban on “promotional material” produced by “central and local government”, such as is normally put in place before elections and referendums, would be lifted for the EU campaign.

The move would allow government departments to use official resources to make the case for a Yes vote if Mr Cameron comes out in favour of the UK remaining within the EU. The use of such resources was banned during the recent referendums on Scottish independence and proportional representation, both of which subjected them to a period of “purdah”.

Owen Paterson was sacked as Environment Secretary in July last year

In a sign of bitter divisions within their party, senior Tory Eurosceptics said they would tackle ministers on the plan in the Commons and would seek to amend the legislation if it was not withdrawn.

“It’s completely unacceptable. It really is,” Mr Paterson told The Independent on Sunday. “So I will definitely be speaking on Tuesday to say that purdah should be maintained as it [was] in the Scottish referendum and AV [alternative vote] referendum and all recent general elections.

“It is completely wrong that there should be material put out by local government, central Government, or above all the European level of government, in the final days [before] the poll. It’s pretty obvious they’re trying to load the debate.”

Mr Fox added: “I think on such a delicate subject, when the Conservative Party will need to be held together afterwards, it would be unwise to break with any previous conventions.

“The Government taking a stance on the issue [is different from] abolishing purdah. The Government is quite entitled to take a stance one way or the other but it would be unwise to break with convention.”

Bernard Jenkin, who is standing to be re-elected as the Conservative chairman of the Public Administration Select Committee, said he was also deeply unhappy with the Government’s plan.

“This is what we call the abolition of purdah. It’s an outrage,” he said. “These are provisions written into the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act to provide for fair referendums.

“The Government are trying to give themselves a free pass to use the entire panoply of the state to campaign for the result they want. That makes nonsense of the spending limits on the Yes and No campaigns.”

In the Scottish referendum, the SNP condemned the Treasury for publishing a series of papers examining the economic cost to Scotland of leaving the UK.

The work was used widely by No campaigners but disputed by the Scottish Government.

Opponents of Britain’s membership of the EU fear that the Treasury will produce similar documents in the run-up to the EU referendum, to sway the debate and “scare” voters into supporting the Yes campaign.

They are also concerned that it could allow the European Commission to weigh in behind the Yes campaign with announcements designed to appeal to wavering voters.

Former Secretary of State for Defence Liam Fox has also criticised the plans (Getty)

Steve Crowther, the chairman of Ukip, said: “With no guarantee from the Government that they will set and enforce fair and equal spending limits, this omission leaves the door open for the Government or indeed the European Union’s agencies to make ever more appealing announcements, right up to polling day, to ‘nudge’ people towards a vote to stay in.

“The people have waited 40 years for this opportunity and they must be given a free, fair and open choice to decide whether we stay in the EU or reclaim our ability to govern ourselves.”

Labour has yet to say whether it will support the Government’s move. The party will almost certainly be supporting a Yes vote but strategists know a Tory rebellion is likely. If Labour were to join with Tory Euro-sceptics in objecting to the move they could defeat the Government.

A government source said the decision to abolish purdah for the referendum merely reflected the fact that, after Mr Cameron’s negotiations with other EU leaders, the Government would have a clear position on the issue, so it would not be necessary to enforce the rules.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in