Theresa May suffers another key defeat after Lords votes to kill off any prospect of a 'no deal' Brexit

Parliament will decide the next steps if the prime minister’s exit deal is rejected in the autumn – unless the defeat is reversed in the Commons

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Monday 30 April 2018 18:04
Comments
House of Lords votes out prospect of UK leaving EU with 'no deal'

Theresa May has suffered a crucial Brexit defeat after the House of Lords voted to kill off any prospect of the UK crashing out of the EU with “no deal”.

Peers voted by 335 votes to 244 to ensure parliament – rather than the government – decides the next steps if the prime minister’s exit deal is rejected in the autumn.

Unless the defeat is overturned in the Commons, it increases the chances of softening the deal and sending the government back to the negotiating table if the agreement is rejected.

Earlier, Lord Callanan, a Brexit minister, refused to commit to reversing the vote, saying: “Let’s wait and see what happens – then we will decide our position in the House of Commons.”

The caution may reflect confidence among some Conservatives that there is also enough support in the Commons for the cross-party plan.

The prime minister and other ministers have repeatedly insisted that rejection of her deal will simply mean the UK leaving the EU, in March next year, with no agreement at all.

For that reason, Sir Keir Starmer Labour’s shadow Brexit secretary, hailed the thumping defeat as “a hugely significant moment in the fight to ensure parliament has a proper role”.

“If parliament votes down the Article 50 deal, then parliament must decide what happens next, Sir Keir said.

“Under no circumstances can the prime minister be given a blank cheque to crash the UK out of the EU without a deal.

“I would urge the prime minister to accept this cross-party amendment and recognise that there is no majority in parliament or the country for a no deal Brexit.”

Viscount Hailsham, the former Tory minister who tabled the amendment, said it was aimed at ensuring “that the future of our country is determined by parliament and not by ministers”.

“In democracies, both parliament and the electorate have the right to change their minds. Unchangeable decisions have no place in a democracy,” he added.

And Caroline Lucas, the co-leader of the Green party and supporter of the People’s Vote campaign, said it raised the prospects of a fresh referendum on the exit deal.

“MPs should respond by ensuring the public are also able to express their view on the final Brexit deal, which will affect generations for generations to come,” she said.

A total of 19 Conservative peers defied the government to back the amendment, including former deputy prime minister Lord Heseltine and former cabinet ministers Lord Patten and Lord Willetts.

It is the second crushing defeat inflicted by the Lords on the main Brexit bill, after last week’s vote to keep the UK in a customs union after departure.

The Brexit department said it was “disappointed” by the vote – but again stepped short of committing to reversing it.

“What this amendment would do is weaken the UK’s hand in our negotiations with the EU by giving parliament unprecedented powers to instruct the government to do anything with regard to the negotiations – including trying to keep the UK in the EU indefinitely,” it warned.

More follows…

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in