Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Freedom of information review: Government rules out charges for FOI requests

A review of the policy concluded that the Act was working well

Jon Stone
Tuesday 01 March 2016 11:47 GMT
Comments
FOI is often used to hold officials and the Government to account
FOI is often used to hold officials and the Government to account

Ministers have decided not to introduce monetary charges for freedom of information requests, following a review of the policy.

Under the Freedom of Information Act, introduced in 2000, any private citizen can request any information held by a public body, subject to certain restrictions.

FOI is regularly used by campaigners and the media to scrutinise the Government’s activities, at both a local and national level.

Officials and ministers have however complained that the extra scrutiny the Act provides does not give them a “safe space” to discuss things without the public knowing about it.

Tony Blair has said he regrets introducing the law, describing himself as a “naive, foolish, irresponsible nincompoop”.

The Government set up a Freedom of Information Commission last year to look at the policy and how it might be changed.

One of the ways proposed to water down the transparency rules was to introduce fees – however this has now been rejected.

“After 10 years, we took the decision to review the Freedom of Information Act and we have found it is working well,” Cabinet Office minister Matthew Hancock said.

“We will not make any legal changes to FOI. We will spread transparency throughout public services, making sure all public bodies routinely publish details of senior pay and perks.

“After all, taxpayers should know if their money is funding a company car or a big pay-off.”

The Government – which has a slim majority and could face defeat over any controversial proposals – says it will not legislate to change the Act.

In September newspapers including the Independent, Guardian, the Daily Mail, Metro, Evening Standard, the Sun, Times, Telegraph and Mirror group, signed a joint letter addressed to the Prime Minister asking him not to water down the law.

Britain’s top civil servant, the Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood, also said he opposed significant changes to the Act’s powers and instead favoured clarification.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in