George Osborne's tax deal with Google in the spotlight as French authorities raid the company's offices

The Chancellor was accused of being 'too easily satisfied' by a 3 per cent tax deal

Jon Stone
Wednesday 25 May 2016 14:06
Comments
George Osborne takes PMQs on 25 May 2016
George Osborne takes PMQs on 25 May 2016

George Osborne’s tax deal with Google has again been put in the spotlight, after French tax officials raided the company Paris headquarters.

Labour accused the Chancellor of being “too easily satisfied” by a 3 per cent tax rate or £130 million deal with the search giant – branded “disproportionately small” by an influential parliamentary committee at the time.

Around 100 agents entered the search giant’s office in Central Paris at 5am on Tuesday morning amid allegations it has not paid €1.6bn in taxes in the country. The probe by French authorities comes just months after Mr Osborne hailed his UK deal with the company to pay a much smaller amount as a “major success”.

At Prime Minister’s Question time Angela Eagle, shadow business secretary, asked Mr Osborne to clarify aspects of the deal, arguing that he was “too easily satisfied on tax dodging”.

“Given the overnight news of the French authorities’ dawn raid on Google investigating allegations of aggravated financial fraud and money laundering,

does the Chancellor now regret calling his cosy little tax deal with the same company ‘good news for the British taxpayer’?” she asked.

“I note that even [Boris Johnson] labeled his cosy little deal ‘derisory’ and the British public think it’s even worse.

Angela Eagle asks about Google tax

“Despite all the rhetoric, on his watch the tax gap has actually gone up; this tax deal with the Swiss raised a fraction of the revenue he boasted that it would, and the OBR blames the lack of resources in revenue and customs.

“Why has he sacked 11,000 tax staff since 2010? When is he going to give them the resources they need to do a proper job?”

At the time of the deal the Public Accounts Committee said the £130m settlement with the company “seems disproportionately small” compared to the size of its British business.

According to analysis by the Independent, Google could owe the UK six times more than it has agreed to pay, or £800 million.

Mr Osborne replied to Ms Eagle that the government had in fact increased HMRC resources. He did not mention specifics of the Google deal.

“We increased resources for the HMRC to tackle tax evasion and avoidance. We’ve introduced a diverted profits tax so companies like Google can’t shift their profits offshore anymore,” he said.

“We’ve made sure that banks pay a higher tax bill than they ever did under the last Labour government.

Ms Osborne and Ms Eagle were standing in for David Cameron and Jeremy Corbyn due to Mr Cameron being unable to attend.

A spokesperson for Google said: "We comply with French law and are co-operating fully with the authorities to answer their questions."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in