Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lives 'at risk' as tower blocks left unsafe after Grenfell-style cladding removed, ministers told

Some high-rise blocks are still flouting fire regulations or have structural flaws since contractors removed flammable cladding, experts warn

Lizzy Buchan
Political Corespondent
Friday 29 June 2018 23:07 BST
Comments
Claire Curtis Thomas, chief executive officer of BBA: 'You have poor installation of that product you could still have the situation we have seen in Grenfell'

Lives could be put at risk by shoddy work to remove highly-flammable cladding from tower blocks in the wake of the Grenfell Tower disaster, ministers have been warned.

Contractors have left some high-rise blocks even more unsafe than when they began removing the cladding, experts said, with some buildings still flouting fire regulations, while the most extreme cases revealed "serious structural issues" after repairs.

Housing minister Dominic Raab is set to be grilled by MPs on Monday over what emerged as a fresh hurdle in the government’s drive to make tower blocks safe.

The Independent reported earlier this week how the number of private tower blocks covered in the flammable material is twice as high as previously thought.

Claire Curtis-Thomas, chief executive officer of the British Board of Agrement (BBA), the industry's certification body, told MPs that contractors doing repairs were either "suffering with rank ignorance" or complicit in doing a bad job, after her team discovered 30 tower blocks were still unsafe after the cladding was removed.

She told the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee (CLG) that companies were being "silenced" by the potential cost of repairs, which could run to millions if remedial work has to be re-done.

The findings open up a new front in the battle to improve the safety of high-rise buildings after Grenfell Tower, where flammable cladding was blamed for the rapid spread of the blaze through the west London tower block.

Labour committee chairman, Clive Betts, warned that poorly-done work could cost lives, as well as racking up major bills for the government if further repairs need to be made.

Mr Betts told The Independent: “If there are 30 that are wrong - if it was the odd one you might think an individual has made a failure - but again it’s about having people who are not completely qualified or don’t completely understand everything doing the job.

"I think there is a wider implication. The construction industry is not fit for purpose if it's got products which shouldn't be on buildings, it's installed in a way that shouldn't be installed, it's got people who are not competent and jobs that are done where no one seems accountable at the end of the day."

He has written to housing secretary James Brokenshire over the news and vowed to get answers from the housing minister Dominic Raab when he appears before MPs on Monday.

Mr Betts added: "Two things need to happen. There's clear a significant cost that the government's going to have pay for.

"And somebody needs to be held accountable for this. It's not this, 'Oh we got it wrong, let's put it right'. We got it so badly wrong that people have to be held properly accountable.

"This is not just a mistake that cost money, it's a mistake that could have cost people's lives - or could cost people's lives unless it is corrected."

The figures emerged during a committee hearing this week, where Ms Curtis-Thomas told MPs that a team of specialists had found that 30 of the 32 buildings they examined had been left in an unsafe state.

The team found that the “substrate” - which supports the cladding - was not compliant with fire-safety regulations in many cases, while two buildings had “serious structural issues”.

Ms Curtis-Thomas said: “You can have non-combustible materials but if you have poor installation of that productyou could still have the situation we have seen in Grenfell.”

She went on: “The people that are carrying out the remediation work are either completely ignoring what they’re seeing below the cladding that they’re actually removing or they don’t understand what they’re looking at.

“The lack of competence on the ground to determine whether the job has been done properly is woeful and secondly, the people who are designing these systems, either are complicit in doing a bad job or actually they’re also suffering with rank ignorance.”

Ministers should either order remedial works or start the repairs from scratch to prevent further risks, both of which will rack up a major cost, Ms Curtis-Thomas said.

“Just re-cladding the building might cost you £1m. If you start to look at remediation this starts to look like a £2 or £3m job," she said.

“So the cost of doing the work, I think, silences quite a number of organisations.”

The BBA has written to the government to express their fears that guidance was not being understood or followed, and demanded an audit of work that have already been done.

Sir Ken Knight, who chairs the independent expert panel on building safety, told MPs: “That would cause me real concern, because the expert panel has issued clear advice via DCLG [Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government] to both building owners and building authorities, that it isn't just replacing cladding, it’s about the system behind it, the intumescent strips, the separation of the gaps.

“We have never said it’s just about cladding, we have said the building system needs to be looked at."

The government is mulling a ban on combustible building materials, despite a long-awaited report by Dame Judith Hackitt

Theresa May vowed to spend £400 stripping dangerous cladding from public buildings however it is still unclear who will pay for privately-owned blocks, after some building owners refused to meet the costs.

Earlier, Mr Brokenshire announced a new taskforce to ensure plans to make private blocks safe “are put in place swiftly”.

However he admitted in a written statement that work has begun on just 21 of the buildings and completed on only four.

An MHCLG spokesperson said: “Nothing is more important than ensuring people are safe in their homes. Following the Grenfell Tower tragedy, we acted swiftly to establish a comprehensive testing programme, issued clear guidance to building owners and commissioned an independent review of building regulations and fire safety by Dame Judith Hackitt.

“It is for building owners to ensure that their buildings are safe and they should employ competent experts to advise them.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in