MPs back new law that forces councils to stop people becoming homeless
The Homelessness Reduction Bill’s Second Reading passed without a vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A plan to force councils to give more help to people at risk of becoming homeless before they lose their home has passed a key step towards becoming law.
The Homelessness Reduction Bill, proposed by Conservative backbencher Bob Blackman, would require local authorities to help anyone 56 days away from homelessness secure accommodation. Currently the figure is 28 days.
The private member’s bill passed its second reading on Friday without a vote because no MPs indicated that they would vote against it.
Earlier this month the Government announced it would back the private member’s bill following some changes after consultations with councils.
Though the bill enjoyed cross-party support, MPs said the Government had to provide the resources to councils to ensure it would work as planned.
Labour’s shadow housing minister John Healey said: “If the Government is serious about this bill and if ministers mean what they say about homelessness, then they must do two things – fund the costs of the extra duties in this Bill in full, and tackle the causes of the growing homelessness crisis in this country.
“Those will be the two tests that we on this side hold the Government hard to account.”
Conservative MP Mark Prisk added that the Government had to “play its part” and provide “additional funding for many councils in order for them to fulfil [the new] commitment”.
Some MPs spoke critically of the bill despite not voting against it, however. Labour centrist Mike Gapes said the proposed law was wishful thinking and “gesture politics” because it did not provide extra homes.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments