David Leakey – known as Black Rod in Westminster – is standing down after seven years in the role as the senior official responsible for maintaining order in the upper chamber.
But in an unprecedented intervention upon leaving the post, Mr Leakey urged politicians to strop dragging out a decision on the full-scale overhaul of the Palace of Westminster in order to avoid a potential catastrophe.
“I know what the risk are here,” he told the House magazine. “Knowing the detail that the expert recommendation is that you should do this quick and now, not slowly over time in phases.”
“I know that is necessary in order to prevent another Grenfell Tower happening here. And that’s the point.
Mr Leakey said that if politicians did not learn the lessons of the Grenfell Tragedy, which claimed 71 lives, the Westminster building could burn down “just like it did in 1834 when there was a decade of delay and procrastination about how or when to refurbish the building”.
He added: “We will again be accused of sitting on our hands. What an embarrassment and a disgrace it would be to our nation if our Parliament suddenly disintegrated in a puff of asbestos because the steam pipes burst in the cavities around this building and the electricity and the IT infrastructure went with them.”
Warning there could be a “major fire” and “loss of life”, he continued: “The state of the fabric of this building is a red risk - the highest risk you can have in your risk register in terms of the likelihood of something happening, and of the impact of the consequences.”
Mr Leakey said a “Grenfell dynamic” was making some politicians hesitant about spending huge sums of money of renovating Parliament.
“This is a national, global, iconic building. It has got to be either knocked down and rebuilt, or it has to be preserved because it is so iconic, and that is the decision that has been taken - the right one, I think.
“Speaking as a taxpayer, on that assumption, there is only one option, and that is doing it quickly and in the most economical way and that should be the end of the matter.
“The politicians have a more difficult problem. They will see it from the perspective of what is described as 'the Grenfell dynamic - if we couldn't spend a few million on the cladding of a residential tower block, why should we be spending billions - and it will be billions - on refurbishing the Parliament of this country?'
“This seems an unequal and disproportionate use of the taxpayers' money, and I really understand that Grenfell perspective and the dilemma in which the politicians find themselves too.
“So, here is the decision that politicians have got to take. They have got to find the courage to take a decision, the right decision, and stand by it, and justify it, and that will take some courage.
“Everybody probably has a finite pool of courage and you can exhaust your courage.
“I understand, therefore, that with so many tough current political issues on their plates, politicians need to pick carefully in which priorities to invest their courage."
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies