Kelly inquiry: The case against No 10

The denigration of David Kelly as a "Walter Mitty" character was the nadir of Downing Street's performance in this sorry affair. The crassness, the timing - 48 hours before his funeral - the attempt to switch the attack from the BBC to the scientist, summed up how badly No 10 has mishandled matters.

The death of Dr Kelly, and the fallout from it, the prospective end to the careers of ministers and civil servants, the acceleration of mistrust of the Government, might not have happened if the spotlight had not turned on BBC reporter Andrew Gilligan's report. Some government detractors claims this was a cynical diversionary tactic by Alastair Campbell, Tony Blair's communication's chief.

Mr Gilligan's "45 minutes" claim related to the first, September dossier, which was "signed off" by the joint intelligence committee despite reservations in the intelligence services. Mr Campbell's aim was to deflect the focus from the plagiarised "dodgy" February dossier, as well as what had happened to Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction, the reason given for the war. Mr Campbell, and Blair loyalists such as the junior minister Ben Bradshaw, put such pressure on the BBC to reveal its source they forced Dr Kelly to break cover. The Ministry of Defence press office confirmed his name to reporters, but it is thought unlikely they would have done so without consulting No 10.

Mr Gilligan's report on Radio 4's Today programme accused the Government of inserting the claim that Iraq could have chemical and biological weapons ready to fire in 45 minutes. In an article in The Mail on Sunday, he named Mr Campbell as the one responsible. BBC journalists Gavin Hewitt, on News at Ten, and Susan Watts on Newsnight, also filed reports on the dossier, after talking to Dr Kelly. They did not make the claims of the Gilligan article.

Then, with the Foreign Affairs Select Committee inquiring into the government case for the Iraq war, the Government suddenly began to be "outraged" by the Gilligan report. Mr Campbell demanded an apology from the BBC for "lies". The "dodgy" dossier and the lack of weapons in Iraq was obscured.

But matters moved "off script" with Dr Kelly's suicide. The BBC said Ms Watts had taped her conversation with him, and he had mentioned Mr Campbell. Downing Street felt it could no longer claim Mr Gilligan invented his story.

So the attack was switched from the BBC to Dr Kelly's credibility. As the Blairs holidayed in Barbados, having called for "respect and restraint", Tom Kelly, a No 10 spokesman, briefed journalists, describing the scientist as a "Walter Mitty"-style character.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in