Brexit: Labour’s Lords leader pledges not to delay triggering of Article 50

Labour has tabled some amendments to the bill but says there will be no ‘ping-pong’

Jon Stone
Political Correspondent
Sunday 12 February 2017 12:50
Comments
Baroness Smith says the Lords are going to do ‘what David Davis calls our patriotic duty’
Baroness Smith says the Lords are going to do ‘what David Davis calls our patriotic duty’

Labour’s leader in the House of Lords has pledged not to hold up or “frustrate” the triggering of Article 50 – as the Government’s bill moves to the House of Lords for scrutiny.

The Bill going through Parliament at the moment is required to give the Government the power to start Brexit negotiations, which Theresa May has said she wants to do by the end of March.

Baroness [Angela] Smith pledged no “extended ping-ping” between the House of Commons and the House of Lords, but said peers would try to add “legitimate” amendments to the Bill. Labour’s peers have tabled a number of ideas they say could make the Brexit process run more efficiently, including the call for a meaningful vote on the final deal.

The Government has no majority in the House of Lords – a first for a Conservative government – meaning that it must rely on the support of peers from other parties and none to clear the way for its legislative programme.

Disagreements between the Lords and the Commons can sometimes lead to long delays in legislation being passed as the Bill is sent back and forth between the two houses. The Commons does, ultimately, have the ability to overrule the Lords, though this approach is only used as a last resort.

“We won’t frustrate, we’re not going to wreck, we’re not going to sabotage,” Baroness Smith told the BBC’s Sunday Politics programme. “We are going to do what David Davis calls our patriotic duty.

“We’ll scrutinise the bill, we’ve got amendments down. We’ve got eight down from the Labour party. We’ll look at those – it depends on the Government response really, whether or not we vote on those and how many of those we vote on.

“But there could be amendments asking the Commons to look at thing again – that’s what we normally do, it’s not the wrong thing to do.”

She continued: “I don’t see any extended ping-pong at all. I think what would happen is asking the Commons to think again on things is perfectly legitimate. After all, if you look at the issues we’re not talking about the outcome of the negotiations, we’re talking about the process.”

Some Conservatives, including former Brexit taskforce chief Oliver Letwin, have suggested that the House of Lords should be abolished if it holds up the process of triggering Article 50 later than March.

Speaking on the same programme on Sunday morning, Mr Letwin said it would be wrong to try to amend a bill that was only two clauses long because there was “nothing to scrutinise” in it.

MPs rejected all amendments to the Bill and passed it in its original form, despite attempts from Labour, Lib Dem and SNP MPs.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in