Lib Dem Conference: Coalition Government could come to early end before 2015 general election, says Vince Cable
Business Secretary claims he could walk out of the Government if his colleagues allowed the Conservatives to pursue policies that crossed his personal 'red lines'

Vince Cable last night became the first senior Liberal Democrat to raise the prospect of the Coalition Government coming apart before the next general election in 2015.
In controversial comments, at the Independent fringe meeting, the Business Secretary put himself at odds with Nick Clegg by saying it was ācertainly possibleā for the power-sharing deal to come to an early end.
The Liberal Democrat leader has always made clear, both publicly and privately, that he wants the Coalition to continue āright up to the wireā.
But Mr Cable said of an early split: āItās certainly possible. We are not at the stage of talking about that process. It is obviously a very sensitive one. It has got to be led by the leader. We have not yet had those conversations.ā
He also suggested that he himself might walk out of the Government if his Lib Dem colleagues allowed the Conservatives to pursue policies that crossed his personal āred linesā.
Asked whether what issues might force him to quit his job, Mr Cable replied: āPresident Obama has illustrated very eloquently in recent weeks the dangers of parading your red lines in public.ā
His surprise comments will add to speculation that the Business Secretary, seen as the figurehead of the Lib Dem Left, has not abandoned his leadership ambitions.
Last week his close ally, Lord Oakeshott, delivered a withering verdict on Mr Cleggās leadership and said next Mayās local elections were the ālast chanceā for the party to change direction.
At the fringe meeting, sponsored by RSA Insurance, Mr Cable said the Conservatives had resorted to ādog-whistle politicsā this year by signalling their hostility to benefits claimants and immigrants.
The Business Secretary delivered a venomous attack on his Coalition partnersā rightwards lurch in his keynote speech to the Glasgow conference.
He was unrepentant over the strength of his attack, telling last nightās meeting: āItās happened in the last few months and that needed a political response.ā
Mr Cable insisted the party had to maintain its equidistance between the Tories and Labour in the run-up to the general election in 2015.
But he added: āWe will talk about fairness, thatās the language we will be using about tax and corporate reform. Itās about the things we have stopped the Tories doing.ā
Mr Cable said he was deeply unhappy at calls by senior Conservatives for moves to remove many employment rights. He told the packed meeting: āWe did stop a rush to some really damaging legislation that would have swept away workersā rights in a quite extreme way.
āWe as the Liberal Democrats stopped that ā that was one of our wins in government.ā
He also criticised the recent ādisgracefulā anti-immigration vans as part of a Home Office campaign and also plans to impose a Ā£3000 bonds on some people coming to visit Britain. He said the idea ā first proposed by Nick Clegg had been āmisusedā by Conservatives.
Originally it was intended only for people who had already been denied visas but was later rolled out to include other visitors as well.
Mr Cable also took a swipe at the āanti-wind cultureā among right-wing Tories, which the Lib Dems had resisted fiercely in government.
Asked what other Cabinet post he would like to have filled, he made clear his dream job would have been the Chancellorship.
āI donāt think I even need to answer that,ā he said to laughter. āYou know my interest is basically economics. There are two economic departments and I run one. Iāll leave you to guess the answer.ā
Mr Cable defended his ābluntā warning of a potential housing bubble, insisting it was his duty to speak out on the issue.
He said he would not apologise for āruffling a few feathersā.
The Business Secretary repeated his suggestion that the coalition's flagship Help to Buy scheme, which would underwrite mortgages for people who only have a five per cent deposit, could be restricted to areas where property prices are low.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments