The DWP's Work Programme is actually making mental health problems worse, study finds
People on the programme report worsening health problems and reducing work motivation
The Government’s Work Programme is making the lives of people with mental health problems worse and actually making them less able to work, research by a charity has found.
Mind said the flagship scheme, which requires people to take unpaid work allocated by contractors on pain of losing their benefits, was taking entirely the wrong approach and actually undermining work.
Research by the charity found that most people on the scheme because of their mental health problems reported worsening health issues due to their experiences of it.
83 per cent of people surveyed said the scheme’s “support” had made their mental health problems worse of much worse.
Additionally, over three quarters of people – 76 per cent – said the Work Programme had actually made them feel less able to work than before they were allocated to it.
The results chime with figures released in a number of previous years suggesting that people on the Work Programme are actually less likely to return to work than people who are simply left to their own devices.
In the first year of the ÂŁ450million programme, just two out of 100 people on the scheme returned to work for more than six months.
In 2013 Labour’s then shadow work and pensions secretary Liam Byrne described the scheme as “literally worse than doing nothing”.
“Cutting someone’s support for failing to meet certain requirements causes not just financial problems but a great deal of psychological distress too,” Mind’s chief executive Paul Farmer wrote on the PoliticsHome website.
Mental Health Awareness: Facts and figures
Mental Health Awareness: Facts and figures
1/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
2/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
3/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
4/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
5/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
6/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
7/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
8/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
9/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
1/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
2/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
3/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
4/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
5/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
6/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
7/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
8/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
9/9 Mental Health Foundation: Living With Anxiety report 2014
“This punitive approach is backfiring … even the threat of being sanctioned can be enough to cause anxiety.
“We often hear from people who are filled with dread every time they receive a letter or phone call, in case they’re told the vital support they get from disability benefits has been reduced or stopped altogether.”
The charity said other models for schemes could be administered at a lower cost and produce better outcomes.
Mental health has moved up the political agenda in recent weeks. David Cameron yesterday admitted that his Government could “do more” to improve mental health services.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn meanwhile announced the creation of a dedicated mental health minister for his shadow cabinet. He also used his first Prime Minister's Questions to raise the issue and attended a fundraiser for a mental health trust on his first day as leader.
The Independent contacted the Department for Work and Pensions for comment on this story.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne}}Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne_p}}Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.