Stay up to date with notifications from TheĀ Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Government will vote against making misogyny a hate crime after House of Lords backs new law, Dominic Raab suggests

Peers backed an amendment to the policing bill that would require police to record misogyny

Lizzie Dearden
Home Affairs Editor
Tuesday 18 January 2022 17:59 GMT
Comments
'The 97 March’ protesters gathered in London to protest aganst misogyny, male violence and street harassment
'The 97 March’ protesters gathered in London to protest aganst misogyny, male violence and street harassment (Angela Christofilou)

The government will vote against making misogyny a hate crime after a new law was backed by the House of Lords, Dominic Raab has suggested.

An amendment to the policing bill, brought by the Tory peer and former victims commissioner Baroness Newlove, was voted through by 242 votes to 185 on Monday night.

Former Conservative Party chair Baroness Warsi was among the peers supporting the change, which would require police to record crimes motivated by hostility towards the sex or gender of the victims, and make judges take it into account when sentencing offenders.

MPs will vote on the amendment when the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill returns to the House of Commons, but Mr Raab suggested the government would oppose it on Tuesday.

The justice secretary told BBC Breakfast that ministers had already put the ā€œright measuresā€ in place and considered making misogyny a hate crime.

ā€œWe looked at it very seriously, the Law Commission went and looked at it for quite some time and came to the view it would be counter-productive and not effective as a measure, so we want to take the most effective measures,ā€ Mr Raab added.

ā€œWe take this very seriously, we need to deal with this in a whole range of ways.ā€

He said the government was taking other measures to ā€œmake women feel more supportedā€, including extending time limits for reporting domestic assaults, and criminalising ā€œbreastfeeding voyeurismā€.

Mr Raab was ridiculed for previous remarks on misogyny in October, when he said it was ā€œabsolutely wrong, whether it’s a man against a woman or a woman against a manā€.

Addressing the House of Lords on Monday, Baroness Newlove said much of the violence towards women in British society was caused by the ā€œmisogyny that some hold in their heartsā€.

ā€œIf we want to restore confidence for women that the police and the criminal justice system want to keep them safe from those who would do them harm, we need to start by naming it and then doing something about it,ā€ she added.

ā€œIt is perverse that, despite 3 million crimes being committed against women in just three years, our legal and policing systems do not routinely recognise what we all know is blindingly obvious: the deep-rooted hostility towards women that motivates many of these crimes.

Dominic Raab claims men can be victims of misogyny in BBC interview

ā€œAs a society we have rightly taken steps to acknowledge the severity of racist or homophobic crimes, but have not yet acted on crimes driven by hatred of women.ā€

Baroness Newlove said the amendment was a chance ā€œto ensure that the law is on the side of women, rather than on that of those who seek to abuse and harass themā€, adding: ā€œIt is time for deeds, not words.ā€

An official review stopped short of calling for misogyny to be made a hate crime last month, despite mounting calls for change following the murder of Sarah Everard.

The Law Commission said sex or gender should not be made a ā€œprotected characteristicā€ that can be used to record incidents and increase sentences alongside race, religion and other factors.

Following a review commissioned by the government in 2018, the independent body said the move would be ā€œineffective at protecting women and girls and in some cases, counterproductiveā€.

A group of women’s rights and hate crime organisations, including the Fawcett Society and Citizens UK, said the review was too narrow and had offered no alternatives to ā€œhelp address widespread concerns about the lack of action by the criminal justice systemā€.

The Law Commission’s position was also at odds with senior police officers who publicly backed making misogyny a hate crime last year.

The national police lead for hate crime, Mark Hamilton, said he personally supported adding sex or gender to the current list of protected characteristics.

He told a conference in November it would not cause officers to be ā€œinundated with bureaucracyā€ and added: ā€œI think it’s a good way of understanding offender behaviour and preventing things escalating from the more minor offences up to sexually motivated crime and murder.ā€

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in