Scottish independence: More austerity if independent Scotland is to balance books, says think-tank

Per capita public spending is currently 11 per cent higher in Scotland than in the rest of the UK

Ben Chu
Monday 18 November 2013 20:26
Comments
Public spending In Scotland is now 11 per cent higher than in the rest of the UK
Public spending In Scotland is now 11 per cent higher than in the rest of the UK

An independent Scotland would need to endure additional austerity in order to balance the new government’s books, according to a study by a respected economic think-tank.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies said on Monday that the size of an independent Scotland’s “fiscal gap” would be 1.9 per cent of its GDP, compared to 0.8 per cent for the UK as a whole. That would equate to around £3bn a year. Closing the gap would entail further spending cuts or tax rises beyond George Osborne’s present round of austerity in order to stabilise the new country’s finances.

By way of illustration, the IFS said that closing the gap could be achieved by increasing the basic rate of income tax in Scotland to 29 per cent, increasing VAT to 28 per cent, or cutting public spending by 8 per cent. “An independent Scotland would face even tougher choices than those faced by the UK over the longer term,” said Gemma Tetlow of the IFS, one of the report’s authors.

The findings are likely to sharpen the debate ahead of Scotland’s referendum on independence which will take place on 15 November 2014.

At the moment, public spending per head of the population in Scotland is around 11 per cent higher than in the rest of the UK, while taxation raises a similar amount per head. The difference could currently be offset by higher revenues from North Sea energy supplies, but the IFS also concluded that declining oil revenues and a more rapidly ageing population would put growing pressure on the public purse.

The think-tank said that the precise size of Scotland’s fiscal hole would depend on the share of the national debt it inherited from the UK, the interest rates it faced on that borrowing and the level of immigration. But even under the most optimistic assumptions, Scotland would likely face a steeper challenge than the rest of the UK, it added.

An independent Scotland’s national debt is projected to rise above 100 per cent of GDP by the early 2030s in the absence of further austerity. To bring the national debt down to 40 per cent of GDP over the next half-century would require £6bn of cuts (or 4.1 per cent of GDP) in the early part of the next decade.

However, the Scottish National Party’s Finance Minister John Swinney said the report “underlines the case” for independence and pointed to the uncertainties inherent in the IFS projections. “The whole point of independence is to equip Scotland with the competitive powers we need to make the most of our vast natural resources and human talent, and to follow a better path from the current Westminster system which stifles growth and which is responsible for the damaging economic decisions which this report –and its projections – are based on,” he said.

Overall spending on benefits per head is 2 per cent higher in Scotland than the UK as a whole, said the IFS. Disability benefit spending is 22 per cent higher. Spending on housing benefit, however, was 12 per cent lower because of cheaper rents in Scotland. The IFS said that the pattern of public spending in Scotland was “quite different from the rest of the UK”, noting that more is spent on capital-intensive areas such as housing.

The IFS added that independence would give Scotland an opportunity to design a “more efficient” tax system. But it pointed out that an independent Scotland would probably also be vulnerable to tax competition from the UK and cross-border shopping.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in