Natalie Elphicke: Labour face angry backlash over Tory defector’s ‘gaslighting’ women’s rights record
Labour councillor who ran against Ms Elphicke accuses her of ‘gaslighting other women during and around’ trial of her ex-husband
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Natalie Elphicke’s defection to Labour has raised concerns among some in Keir Starmer’s party who condemned her defence of her former husband who was imprisoned after being charged with sexual assault.
After Charlie Elphicke was found guilty of three counts of sexual assault against two women, the MP for Dover said he had been punished for being “attractive” and being “attracted to women”.
Ms Elphicke, who defected to the Labour Party on Wednesday, was temporarily suspended from the Commons in 2021 for trying to influence his trial and was forced to apologise.
Charlotte Cornell, a Labour councillor who ran against Ms Elphicke in Dover in 2019, told The Independent: “Her comments minimised what was predatory behaviour and sexual abuse.
“It is one of the reasons I find today really hard to understand. I know there will be women in the local area who are incredibly upset by today’s decision.”
Ms Cornell, who is a cabinet member on Canterbury City Council, accused Ms Elphicke of “gaslighting other women during and around“ the time of the trial of her former husband.
She added: “She has held fervent anti-union positions. She has mocked Marcus Rashford and anti-child poverty initiatives.”
Ms Elphicke criticised Mr Rashford for missing a penalty in the Euro 2020 final, saying he should be “perfecting his game” rather than “playing politics” after he campaigned against child food poverty.
Ms Cornell argued there are “huge questions“ surrounding the political views which Ms Elphicke holds.
“Her defection comes as a huge shock to many of us and is currently making me feel incredibly uneasy,” she added. “I suppose people’s politics can change and I would welcome Ms Elphicke making some bold statements to correct her previously taken political positions.”
Ms Elphicke won her seat with 56.9 per cent of the vote after standing in Dover in the wake of her now ex-husband being suspended from the Tory Party after he was charged with sexual assault.
A Labour source told The Independent: “Welcoming with open arms someone who has publicly questioned the experiences of victims of sexual assault completely undermines Labour's commitment to ending violence against women and girls.
“Victims across the country will look at this and see a party that simply doesn't take accusations seriously.”
Announcing her decision to defect, Ms Elphicke said changes that the Tory party has undergone since she became an MP have “been dramatic and cannot be ignored”, with Sir Keir welcoming her to the party.
After her ex-husband’s conviction, she sought to defend him in an interview with The Sun, saying he was “attractive, and attracted to women” and this meant he was “an easy target for dirty politics and false allegations”. Her ex-husband was sentenced to two years in prison.
Ms Elphicke and two Tory MPs were ordered to apologise and temporarily suspended from the House of Commons for a day back in July 2021 after they were found to have attempted to influence a judge overseeing the trial of Charlie Elphicke.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments