Consider abolishing the House of Lords if it delays Brexit, former Tory Brexit chief says

Oliver Letwin called for a debate on the issue

Jon Stone
Political Correspondent
Thursday 09 February 2017 14:30
Comments
Oliver Letwin’s unambiguous warning to the Lords was in line with previous Government and right-wing press rhetoric about ‘the will of the people’
Oliver Letwin’s unambiguous warning to the Lords was in line with previous Government and right-wing press rhetoric about ‘the will of the people’

The Government’s former Brexit chief has threatened the House of Lords with the prospect of abolition it tries to delay Article 50.

Oliver Letwin said MPs should consider abolition or “full-scale reform” of the unelected upper chamber if it voted to delay the Brexit bill beyond the end of next month.

The MP and former minister, who was appointed by David Cameron to lead negotiation preparations in the wake of last June’s referendum result, asked the Leader of the House of Commons to make time for the debate.

“Would he find time in government time for a debate – should the other place seek to delay beyond the end of March, passage to our accession for Article 50 – for this House to discuss either the abolition or full-scale reform of the other place?” he asked at the Commons business statement on Thursday afternoon.

David Lidington, the Leader of the House of Commons, said he was hopeful that no debate would be required. “I am more optimistic than my right honourable friend. I think there is an awareness in the House of Lords that as an unelected chamber that there are conventions that apply to how they scrutinise and deal with legislation,” he replied.

“While I don’t want to take anything away from their proper constitutional role I think members of the House of Lords will be very cognisant both that this is the elected House and that we voted by a huge majority of the House last night in favour of the bill – and the fact that behind that vote lay the much bigger vote of the country, still.”

In a statement after the Commons passed the Article 50 bill last night, Brexit Secretary David Davis said the Lords should “do its job and to do its patriotic duty and actually give us the right to go on and negotiate that new relationship”.

Last night the BBC reported an anonymous Government source going further and saying: “If the Lords don't want to face an overwhelming public call to be abolished they must get on and protect democracy and pass this bill.”

MPs passed overwhelmingly the Article 50 Bill at its third reading – meaning it now progresses to the House of Lords for scrutiny. A number of peers, including former Labour MP Peter Hain, have said they will hold up the legislation.

Any delay to the legislation will likely disrupt its tight timetable and make it hard for Theresa May to fill her pledge of beginning EU negotiations by the end of March.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in