Petition urging Theresa May to scrap £35,000 threshold for non-EU migrants soars past 50,000 signatures

Tens of thousands have rallied round to fight the policy which could see teachers, charity workers, healthcare professionals and tech entrepreneurs deported

A petition calling on the Government to scrap a pay threshold for non-EU migrants which “discriminates against low earners” has soared to more than 50,000 signatures in a matter of days.

Under the new rules, which are set to come into effect in April, people who have come to work in Britain from outside the EU will be deported after five years if they fail to show they are earning more than £35,000.

These people need a work sponsor, are not entitled to receive public funds, have to pay a health surcharge to access the NHS and must also put up a sizeable fee – sometimes in excess of £1,000 – to have their visas extended by a year.

Theresa May is yet to respond to the growing clamour to rethink the policy, which appears aimed at starving a relatively minor channel of immigration that provides vital talent to the teaching, charity, healthcare and IT sectors.

A report by the Government’s own Migration Advisory Committee, when asked to assess the policy in 2012, found at the time that only half the number of allocated visas for the “non-EU work route” were actually being taken up.

It said such people “make a modest contribution to the total net flow” of migrants into Britain.

“These migrants also, on average, make a substantial net contribution to the public finances,” said Professor David Metcalf, the committee’s chairman.

The Independent first reported on the creation of a petition to fight the policy change on Friday, when it had under 2,000 signatures.

That number has since soared and is more than halfway to the target of 100,000, which would see the issue put to a debate in the House of Commons.

Joshua Harbord, who set up the petition, told this newspaper it was “stunning” how many people had rallied around the cause.

“I've been getting messages from friends and strangers asking if there's anything else they can do to help, even offering to organise protests,” he said.

“We're now expecting a response from the government at some point after hitting 10,000, and maybe we’ll make it to 100,000 after all! That’s when the real work begins.”

Labour has led opposition calls for ministers to look again at the £35,000, with shadow immigration minister Keir Starmer saying there were “real concerns” over how key industries would be affected.

And the Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman, Alistair Carmichael, said the policy represented “discrimination based on income” which threatened to harm Britain’s place “at the forefront of the global economy”.

The Home Office has been approached for comment.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in