Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Politics Explained

Why did Lee Cain’s possible promotion to No 10 chief of staff cause mayhem in Westminster?

John Rentoul on why a report of a new role prompted the resignation of a Dominic Cummings ally

Thursday 12 November 2020 01:00 GMT
Comments
Cain has served as Downing Street’s director of communications since last year
Cain has served as Downing Street’s director of communications since last year (Reuters)

Talk about a bomb in the bubble. The prime minister was “poised” to promote Lee Cain, his director of communications, to chief of staff, it was reported yesterday morning. This detonated a small explosion in the cloistered world of political advisers and journalists in and around Downing Street, and last night Cain announced he was resigning. 

To understand its significance, we need to rehearse the history of the prime minister’s office. The term “chief of staff” was first used in Margaret Thatcher’s time by David Wolfson, the businessman, but it was more of a grand title than an executive office. 

Tony Blair was the first to appoint a chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, as a political appointee to run No 10 in conjunction with the civil service. He served for the full 10 years. David Cameron had a similar administrative linchpin in the form of Ed Llewellyn for all his six years. 

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in