Public rejects Theresa May’s 'take-it-or-leave-it' threat to leave the EU with no deal

Poll finds most people want the Prime Minister to go back and negotiate a better agreement with the EU if Parliament rejects her Brexit terms, rather than walk away with ‘no deal’

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 31 January 2017 23:00
Comments
Theresa May leaves 10 Downing Street
Theresa May leaves 10 Downing Street

Most British people oppose Theresa May’s “take-it-or-leave-it” threat to leave the EU with no deal and risk a damaging economic crash, a new poll has found.

The Prime Minister is urged instead to go back and negotiate a better agreement with EU leaders if Parliament rejects the Brexit terms she strikes in a “final deal” vote expected in 2019.

The verdict comes ahead of a likely debate next week in which the Government will be urged to concede a “meaningful” vote – one staged early enough for her to go back and seek those better terms.

So far, ministers have refused to say exactly when the crucial vote will take place, or to guarantee it will before the proposals go to the EU Parliament.

And Ms May has insisted a rejection by MPs would see Britain crash out of the EU with no trading agreement at all, because Westminster will not be allowed to “block Brexit”.

Before the referendum, the Treasury forecast that falling back on World Trade Organisation (WTO) tariffs – the likely consequence of leaving with no deal – would deliver a 7.5 per cent hit to GDP by 2030.

The poll is revealed after some Tory MPs joined Labour in calling for the vote on the final deal to carry proper weight, when debate on the Article 50 Bill got under way in the Commons.

Dominic Grieve, the Conservative former Attorney General, insisted it must take place before the European Parliament votes, as he warned that Britain would pay a heavy price for Brexit.

“I think we have made a grave error and I think it is one that will become more and more apparent with the passage of time,” Mr Grieve told ministers.

Neil Carmichael, another pro-EU Conservative, said: “It is essential for Parliament to have some final say on these matters when we get to the endgame.

“You shouldn’t jump out of an aeroplane without checking if the parachute is working – and that is what we need to consider when we head towards the final moment in two years.”

Labour has tabled the amendment calling for a “meaningful” vote, which is likely to be debated when the Article 50 Bill reaches its committee stage – after being given its second reading this week.

Brexit: Nick Clegg on Government's 'sycophantic' relationship with Trump

The demand wins the backing of 51 per cent of people who responded to the YouGov poll, who said the Prime Minister should seek a better deal, if MPs reject her terms.

Only 34 per cent of people said they wanted too leave the EU with no deal.

Voters in every region of the country and in every social group opposed Ms May’s threat to walk away with no deal, as did every age group apart from over-65s.

The findings were seized upon by Pat McFadden, a Labour MP and supporter of the pro-EU Open Britain campaign, who said the public did not want the Prime Minister “putting a gun to Parliament’s head”.

He said: “Leave campaigners were quick to praise the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, but have been much less keen to see it exercised in practice.

“The Article 50 Bill will be approved but attention will then turn to the nature of the future agreement between the UK and the EU.

“A vote on this deal should not be the Government putting a gun to Parliament’s head – it should be a meaningful choice which allows Parliament to send the Government back to the negotiating table if the deal they negotiate is not good enough.”

The European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Bill will allow Ms May to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty and start the withdrawal talks between the UK and the EU.

The Liberal Democrats and Scottish National Party will vote against it at 7pm on Wednesday, but Labour has made the “difficult decision” to back it at second reading – guaranteeing it will pass.

Jeremy Corbyn has said his MPs will also be told to vote for its final reading, next week, even if Labour’s amendments fall, which is likely to trigger further frontbench resignations.

During the debate, Nick Clegg claimed the Prime Minister turned down an offer from Germany to give Britain some form of “emergency brake” over immigration in return for the country adopting a soft Brexit.

The former Liberal Democrat leader said: “Some people say there is no alternative, we must leave the single market, there is no remote chance we could find an accommodation with our European partners. Nonsense.

“But what did this Government choose to do? It decided to spurn all friendship links with Europe. It decided to placate parts of the Conservative Party rather than serve the long-term strategic interests of this country.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in