The British Government lost £1.1m on its commercial venture to run parts of the Saudi Arabian prison system

Just Solutions International spent a quarter of a million pounds on consultants

Jon Stone
Friday 29 January 2016 13:58 GMT
Members of the Saudi special police unit perform during a parade
Members of the Saudi special police unit perform during a parade (Getty Images)

The Government lost over a million pounds on a Ministry of Justice commercial venture that was due to run the Saudi Arabian prison system, an investigation has found.

The National Audit Office, the Government’s spending watchdog, said that Just Solutions International (JSi) had costs of £2.1 million and generated an income of £1 million its existence.

JSi, the trading face of the Ministry of Justice, was set up by civil servants in 2012 to bid for commercial contracts abroad using UK state expertise.

In Autumn 2015 Michael Gove, the newly appointed Justice Secretary, wound up the venture and pulled out of contracts in countries with poor human rights records – Saudi Arabia and Oman.

The policy had been instituted by Mr Gove’s predecessor Chris Grayling. Mr Gove has also cancelled a number of other policies predating his time at the MoJ, including a ban on prisoners being sent books and further cuts to legal aid than those already implemented.

The loss was partly generated because of the decision to terminate the £5.9m deal, the NAO said.

“The NAO estimate that JSi’s costs were approximately £2.1 million from 2012 until its closure, including £239,000 on consultancy services. Therefore JSi made a net loss of approximately £1.1 million in this period,” the office said in a summary of its report.

“This is due, in part, to the decision to withdraw from prospective arrangements with Saudi Arabia and Oman.

“The NAO also note that had JSi not been created, NOMS would have committed funding to support wider international engagement with countries to support FCO and wider Government objectives.”

Michael Gove cancelled the contract
Michael Gove cancelled the contract (Getty)

The decision about whether to scrap the contract was reported to be controversial within the Cabinet.

The Foreign Office in particular was said to be worried that cancelling such a contract would have wider diplomatic ramifications for Britain’s relationship with the country.

Foreign Secretary Phillip Hammond is said to have accused Mr Gove of naivety for his opposition to the contract, leading to a “robust exchange of views” between the two ministers.

Speaking in the House of Commons, Mr Gove played down his role, stressing that the contract had been dropped as part a cross-government review, adding that MoJ resources should be targeted at domestic prison reform.

Amnesty International UK’s Government and Political Relations Manager Lucy Wake said: “On top of the apparent waste of money, there are a still a host of unanswered questions about this ill-fated project.

“It was never clear what human rights safeguards or training were ever going to be built into this murky deal - for example would UK contractors have been actively trying to challenge and prevent human rights violations in countries with notoriously abusive justice systems, not least in Saudi Arabia?

“It’s worrying that ministers appeared to go largely under the radar to set the project it up, even at a time of huge public concern at the UK’s overly-cosy relationship with Saudi Arabia.

“When details began to trickle out, the UK government was still trying to defend the project even after the blogger Raif Badawi was taken out of a Saudi prison cell and publicly flogged and even as the Saudi authorities carried out dozens of executions.

“The last thing the UK should ever have been doing was trying to make money out of overseas justice systems that tolerate secret detention, torture, corporal punishment and executions.”

Announcing the decision to drop the bid last year, the Prime Minister’s official spokeswoman said:

“This bid to provide the additional training to Saudi Arabia has been reviewed and the government has decided that it won’t be proceeding with the bid.

“The review has been on-going following the decision that was announced earlier in September to close down the Just Solutions International branch of the Ministry of Justice that was providing some of these services.”

“We will continue to engage and work with the Saudis on human rights issues, political reform and will continue to raise concerns where we have them.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said Mr Cameron had been “shamed” into a U-turn.

“Why on earth was it set up in the first place? We should be sending a strong message to repressive regimes that the UK is a beacon for human rights and that this contract bid is unacceptable in the 21st century, and would damage Britain's standing in the world,” he said.

The Saudi Arabian justice system makes routine use of crucifixion, beheadings, and lashes.

Amnesty International says the country has executed 175 people over the last year. Crimes punishable by death under Saudi’s penal code include adultery.

Despite the about-face on the prisons contract, the UK still sells billions of pounds worth of arms to Saudi Arabia.

Between May 2010 and May 2015 the Coalition government licenced almost £4bn in arms to the regime, according to figures obtained by the Campaign Against the Arms Trade.

Saudi is currently involved in a military operation in Yemen, where a “humanitarian disaster” is unfolding, according to the United Nations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in