Theresa May will hand out £1bn in 'cash for votes' DUP deal without Parliament's prior approval

Exclusive: MPs will only vote after the money has been granted – despite the Government conceding that ‘authorisation’ is needed

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
@Rob_Merrick
Monday 26 February 2018 19:49
comments
Theresa May and DUP leader Arlene Foster agreed the deal last summer
Theresa May and DUP leader Arlene Foster agreed the deal last summer

Theresa May will hand out the £1bn in her “cash for votes” deal with the Democratic Unionist Party without MPs’ prior approval, The Independent can reveal, putting the Government at risk of legal action.

The Commons will only vote after slices of the funds have been allocated to Northern Ireland, and will be denied a single vote on the overall £1bn – despite the Government conceding last year that Parliament’s “authorisation” is needed.

The decision has been condemned for leaving MPs “cut out of approving the deal”, which gives Northern Ireland a huge spending boost in return for Ms May being propped up in power.

It also prompted Gina Miller, the campaigner who forced the Government to seek Parliamentary consent to start the Brexit process, to step up her threat of a judicial review of the arrangement.

Ms Miller told The Independent that the Government should “do the right thing and get Parliamentary approval for the whole amount upfront”.

“This kind of dodgy behaviour is a betrayal of voters’ trust, an abuse of our values of democratic accountability and an insult to decent, hard-working taxpayers,” she said.

And she added: “I serve notice on the Government that, if you continue to proceed in this cavalier way, my team and I will not hesitate to seek judicial review for this abuse of process.”

Vince Cable, the Lib Dem leader, said the “confidence and supply” agreement reached with the DUP after the Tories’ general election debacle already “threatens to undermine the Good Friday Agreement”.

“Now it appears that Parliament is being cut out of approving the deal by only being allowed to examine spending allocation retrospectively, which is not what Theresa May appeared to promise,” he added.

“This cannot be allowed to happen – MPs must have the vote before the money is allocated.”

Speaking last September, the Prime Minister said MPs would vote on the £1bn as part of “the normal process” for authorising Government spending.

In a letter, a Treasury solicitor pointed to “long-established procedures, under which central government requests the grant of money by the House of Commons” in order to pay out the funds.

That annual “estimates” vote is on Tuesday, but The Independent has learned that MPs will vote only on the £20m already given to Belfast for the financial year about to close.

A further £30m has already been announced for 2018-19 – and ministers say further sums are likely to earmarked in the coming months – but that will not be voted on, despite the estimates covering some other spending in 2018-19.

It is unclear when the rest of the £1bn will be handed over, amid controversy over the failure to restore power-sharing at Stormont and increasing acrimony between the DUP and Sinn Fein.

Downing Street is believed to view the money as useful leverage over the DUP to agree to reach agreement on restoring power-sharing, risking the growing irritation of its partner in government.

It has been reported in Northern Ireland that the £20m is already being spent, but a Government source insisted this was not the case – and that it would only be spent once approved in Tuesday’s vote.

No 10 was asked to comment on why MPs were not being granted a vote before the £1bn was allocated – and on the threat of judicial review – but declined to do so.

It was accused of turning to her “magic money tree” when the £50m was announced in November, to “address immediate pressure in health and education” in Northern Ireland.

The health cash represented an inflation-busting 5.4 per cent boost, but there was no similar increase for England, Wales or Scotland, ahead of the winter NHS crisis.

There seems little prospect of any Conservative MPs rebelling in a vote on delivering cash to the DUP, given that its release is essential for the survival of their Government.

Nevertheless, any Parliamentary debate about the extra funding required would allow Labour to argue for higher spending for the rest of the country.

At one point, Karen Bradley, the new Northern Ireland Secretary, suggested funding would be withheld until the Stormont executive is restored – but quickly retracted that threat.

The DUP appears unlikely to abandon the confidence and supply agreement even if the money is held back, for fear that it would open the door to a Jeremy Corbyn government.

But some Tories fear the DUP could make extra demands before offering its support to pass legislation. The deal itself covers only financial matters and backing to deliver Brexit.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

View comments