Theresa May forced to defend claim she can seal Brexit deal in two years

It follows comments from German Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel in an interview with The Independent 

Joe Watts
Political Editor
Tuesday 04 April 2017 09:37
Comments
Theresa May was asked about Sigmar Gabriel's comments while on a trip to the Middle East
Theresa May was asked about Sigmar Gabriel's comments while on a trip to the Middle East

Theresa May has been forced to defend her claim that it will be possible to seal both a divorce deal and a new trade relationship with the EU in two years, despite Germany’s Foreign Minister casting doubt on it.

Ms May was asked about comments made by Sigmar Gabriel in an interview with The Independent, but said it was "sensible" to ensure there is a clear idea of future arrangements by March 2019.

The Prime Minister’s insistence that the two agreements can be reached by the end of the Article 50 negotiating period, and that they should be bargained over in parallel, is a key sticking point ahead of Brexit talks.

After being asked about Mr Gabriel’s interview, Ms May told Sky News: “There's obviously a legal situation in terms of how the EU can conduct trade negotiations.

“I'm clear that by the point at which we leave the EU, it's right that everybody should know what the future arrangements, the future relationship, that future partnership between us and the European Union will be.

“That's the sensible thing, it's the pragmatic way to look at this, and I believe that's what we will do.”

The Prime Minister stopped short of claiming that a new trade deal could be signed within the two-year period however.

Asked by The Independent whether it is possible to seal both deals in the two years, Mr Gabriel questioned the feasibility of what has now become a key premise of Ms May's approach to Brexit.

Donald Tusk outlines EU guidelines for Brexit talks

“We are as keen as the UK is to complete both agreements as soon as possible,” he said.

“First, we have to get things right on the orderly withdrawal, then we will want to talk as soon as possible about our future relationship and get as far as we can within the next two years.

“However, I don’t want to speculate on time frames at a time when negotiations have not even started yet. Both sides must recognise that an agreement on a wide-ranging partnership will be quite a laborious endeavour.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel was among the first European politicians to pour cold water on Ms May’s idea of conducting divorce talks and trade negotiations in parallel.

European Council President Donald Tusk followed suit when he set out the EU’s draft negotiating position, stating that “sufficient progress” would have to be made on withdrawal talks before trade talks could begin.

Asked what “sufficient progress” would mean to Germany, Mr Gabriel told The Independent: "We want to minimise...uncertainties as soon as possible. This is why I believe the UK and the EU should strive to secure an orderly withdrawal as their first order of business. It’s also why we share the position that has been laid out by President Tusk in the guidelines.”

He then added: “We’ll also have to work together towards achieving certainty that the UK will honour its financial obligations towards the EU.”

Some have put the bill the UK could face - to settle existing commitments to EU programmes and costs - as high as €60bn, though lower estimates come in at half as much.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in