Theresa May set to cut 0.7% foreign aid spending commitment, Downing Street signals

The law requiring 0.7 per cent of gross national income to be spent on aid will be reviewed - as ministers hunt for badly-needed savings

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 13 December 2016 14:27
Comments
Theresa May
Theresa May

Britain’s foreign aid budget is likely to be cut in the next parliament, Theresa May signalled today.

The law requiring 0.7 per cent of gross national income to be spent on aid will be reviewed before 2020, the Prime Minister’s spokeswoman said

The move follows fierce attacks by Conservative MPs and newspapers of the legal commitment, while domestic spending continues to be cut.

There has also been growing criticism of the way some of the £12bn budget is spent, particularly the cash directed through the Government’s private equity arm.

Nevertheless, any move to change the law will be the clearest breach yet with David Cameron’s legacy – and will be condemned by aid agencies.

The possibility of a review first emerged when Chancellor Philip Hammond said that all areas of spending would be re-examined, probably in 2019, before the next Conservative manifesto is produced

However, foreign aid is more difficult to cut – because the 0.7 per cent figure is legally protected.

Today, Ms May’s spokeswoman made clear that overseas aid would be part of the review, saying there were no commitments “beyond” the current Parliament.

She said: “That will be the point when we set out our commitments moving forward - and commitments that will rightly be left for the manifesto.”

Ministers have already hinted the review could see the scrapping of the so-called ‘triple lock’ protecting pensioner incomes.

Save the Children urged Ms May not to scrap the legal commitment, pointing out that it was an “internationally agreed target, set by the UN”.

A spokeswoman said: “Over the last 15 years, British aid has bought the mosquito nets that helped stop six million people dying from malaria, provided the equipment and training that ensured five million childbirths happened safely, and given 11 million children a chance in life by supporting them through education.

“There is cross-party support for 0.7 per cent precisely because it is important to have a standard measurement across countries, and across time, for the commitment we’re willing to make to the world’s poorest people.”

Priti Patel, the International Development Secretary, has been accused of planning to privatise much of the aid budget, by funnelling the money through the private equity arm.

CDC Group – formerly the Commonwealth Development Corporation – has been criticised for pouring money into gated communities, shopping centres and luxury property in poor countries.

A draft Bill will allow the Department for International Development (DfiD) to hike the amount it can give to CDC Group from £1.5bn to £6bn.

Ms Patel also sparked controversy when she suggested some of the aid budget will be switched to help win post-Brexit trade deals.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in