Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tory manifesto: Boris Johnson ditches planned income tax cuts for high earners

National insurance cut next year confirmed, but no timetable for further reductions promised by prime minister

Andrew Woodcock
Political Editor
Sunday 24 November 2019 16:47 GMT
Comments
Boris Johnson waves to climate activists outside Conservative HQ but doesn't answer

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Boris Johnson’s promise of income tax cuts worth £8 billion for Britain’s highest earners has been ditched, the Conservative manifesto confirmed.

The prime minister said he had decided to focus tax cuts instead on “people who need them most” by raising the threshold for National Insurance contributions (NICs) to £9,500 next year.

But there was no provision in costings provided by chancellor Sajid Javid for a further increase in the NIC threshold to £12,500, which the prime minister has set as his “ultimate ambition”

Mr Johnson made the pledge to raise the earnings level at which the 40p income tax rate kicks in from £50,000 to £80,000 during his successful campaign for the Tory leadership earlier this year.

But he confirmed today that the tax cut, which would have benefited the 10 per cent richest households in the UK by up to £6,000 a year, has been dropped.

The manifesto confirmed that the threshold below which no NICs are payable will rise fro £8,632 to £9,500 next year, worth around £100 a year to 31 million workers earning above that amount.

But it set out no timescale for a later increase to £12,500, which Mr Johnson said would be worth about £500 a year to taxpayers.

Mr Javid’s costings document put the price of the initial rise at £2.17 billion in 2020/21, but made no provision for later substantial rises in subsequent years, with the total cost increasing to just £2.5 billion by 2023/24.

Asked why he had dumped plans to give high-earners a tax break, Mr Johnson said: “I haven’t lost any of my tax-cutting zeal. I believe in cutting taxes where you can.

(AP
(AP (AP)

“That’s why we’re cutting taxes on National Insurance, which helps every taxpayer in the country. That’s why we’ve raised the personal allowance.

“We believe in cutting taxes, but I think that at this particular juncture – when people as a result of the economic disaster left by the last Labour government have been going through some quite tough times and when people want to see spending on the NHS now – I think it is right to focus our tax cuts on people who need them most.”

Nimesh Shah, a partner at accounting and tax advisory firm Blick Rothenberg, said: “ The Conservative Manifesto was fairly static on changes to tax, with the only noteworthy announcement being an £868 increase to the National Insurance primary threshold to £9,500. This will provide an annual £104 tax cut across the board for workers.

"Most significantly, the Conservative manifesto made no mention of Boris Johnson’s leadership pledge to increase the basic rate income tax band to £80,000. This measure would have given a tax cut of up to £6,000 but was estimated to cost the Treasury around £8 billion. The proposal appears to have been dropped completely, and it’s difficult to now see if this measure will be introduced."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in