British press dramatically cut criticism of ruling Tories for 2019 election, study finds
Coverage of Labour was also over twice as hostile compared to previous poll
Hostile press coverage aimed at the Labour Party at the 2019 election was more than double the intensity found during 2017’s poll, according to a study of the two campaigns.
Researchers at Loughborough University, who have been tracking political news coverage, also found that British newspapers were half as critical of the Conservative Party in this month’s election as they were in the one two years ago.
Tracking newspaper coverage over five weeks of the 2019 election, the academics found that the intensity of hostile coverage of opposition parties peaked in the final days of the campaign.
By contrast, coverage weighted by circulation was mostly positive about the Conservative Party, with coverage of Boris Johnson’s party improving in the final week.
“This level of negativity towards Labour was far from ‘business as usual’,” the researchers said in a summary of their findings.
“Press hostility to Labour in 2019 was more than double the levels identified in 2017. By the same measure, negative coverage of the Conservatives halved.”
The research also reveals a high presidentialised campaign, with Mr Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn by far the most prominent figures in the media coverage. The researchers found that most contenders for the next Labour leadership contest featured little in coverage.
The study found that Brexit was “by far the most dominant issue” at critical points in the campaign – its start and end – but in intervening periods its prominence was lower.
“Research has shown that many voters only start paying attention in the last days of an election, so the final rush of Brexit coverage could have been consequential,” the researchers said.
While the Conservatives had the edge in press coverage in 2017, the researchers found that the media landscape was much closer at the previous election: the Conservatives had a balance of minus 0.09 to Labour’s minus 0.13 in the balance of positive and negative stories – meaning Labour was only somewhat more negatively portrayed.
In 2019, however, the Conservatives’ balance was negative 0.04, while Labour’s was negative 0.30, far less positive.
Big beasts lose their seats: Prominent MPs gone after election
Big beasts lose their seats: Prominent MPs gone after election
1/10 Dennis Skinner - Labour
2/10 Jo Swinson - Liberal Democrat
3/10 Anna Soubry - The Independent Group for Change
4/10 Dominic Grieve - Independent
5/10 Luciana Berger - Liberal Democrat
6/10 Laura Pidcock - Labour
7/10 Chukka Umunna - Liberal Democrat
8/10 Zac Goldsmith - Conservative
9/10 Nigel Dodds - DUP
10/10 Gareth Snell - Labour
1/10 Dennis Skinner - Labour
2/10 Jo Swinson - Liberal Democrat
3/10 Anna Soubry - The Independent Group for Change
4/10 Dominic Grieve - Independent
5/10 Luciana Berger - Liberal Democrat
6/10 Laura Pidcock - Labour
7/10 Chukka Umunna - Liberal Democrat
8/10 Zac Goldsmith - Conservative
9/10 Nigel Dodds - DUP
10/10 Gareth Snell - Labour
Because the largest newspapers were more friendly to the Conservatives, when weighted by circulation, the final week of the 2019 election gave the Tories a positive score of 30.17 while Labour’s was minus 96.66 – a vast gulf in treatment.
All opposition parties were portrayed negatively, with only the ruling Tories portrayed in a positive light.
The report was produced by the university’s Centre for Research in Communication and Culture. The researchers assessed items from the print editions of The Guardian, The i, The Daily Telegraph, The Times, Financial Times, Daily Mail, Daily Express, Daily Mirror, The Sun, and Daily Star, and assessed each printed item on whether it included a positive, negative, or neutral portrayal of each party.
Comments
Share your thoughts and debate the big issues
Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne}}Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines.
You can find our Community Guidelines in full here.
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Newest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Oldest first
- -1) ? 'active' : ''">
Most liked
{{/moreThanOne_p}}Follow comments
Vote
Report Comment
Subscribe to Independent Premium to debate the big issues
Want to discuss real-world problems, be involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Already registered? Log inReport Comment
Delete Comment
About The Independent commenting
Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment.
The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates.