Government admits ‘no assessment’ carried out of harm from 60% Yemen aid cut

Minister James Cleverly admits huge cut being made while ‘the fear of famine, the risk of famine is significant’

Government admits ‘no assessment’ carried out of harm from 60% Yemen aid cut

No assessment has been carried out of how a “brutal” 60 per cent aid cut will hit the most vulnerable people in Yemen, the government has admitted.

MPs demanded to know what the impact would be on displaced people, women and the disabled – as the war-torn country continues to suffer the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.

But Chris Bold, the development director for Yemen at the Foreign Office, admitted: “We haven’t done an impact assessment.”

James Cleverly, a minister at the department, admitted the cut was being forced through – without the promised vote by MPs – while “the fear of famine, the risk of famine is significant”.

Yemen was also in the grip of a “second wave” of Covid-19, he acknowledged, adding: “Infection numbers look if they are doubling since the beginning of the year.”

Aid groups giving evidence to the international development committee warned of the harsh impact of the UK pledging just £87m to Yemen – a near-60 per cent cut on the amount donated last year

Save the Children said it expected its cash-transfer programme – which had boosted the numbers receiving “acceptable food” in part of Yemen from 46 to 93 per cent – to be wound up in June.

And the Norwegian Refugee Council warned the UK’s reputation was undermined, threatening attempts to improve aid outcomes at the June G7 summit it will host, saying: “Diplomacy has to be matched by substantial funding.”

The Yemen cut will be followed by similar huge reductions for many of the world’s other conflict zones, expected to be confirmed on Thursday.

Syria, Somalia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Libya, Nigeria and the Lebanon are all poised to lose more than half of their funding, a leak revealed.

They are the consequence of Boris Johnson’s widely criticised decision to slash £4bn-a-year from the aid budget, cutting spending from 0.7 to 0.5 per cent of national income.

Mr Cleverly defended the failure to carry out an impact assessment, arguing the way aid projects are delivered “doesn’t lend itself” to such a process.

“It’s not possible for anyone to predict how exactly the situation will play out in Yemen,” the minister told the committee.

And he played down the prospects of the £87m being bumped up over the course of the year, saying: “I can’t give a guarantee on that.”

Of that £87m, 50 per cent will go on the cash-for-food programme, 25 per cent to tackle malnutrition and most of the rest on supporting political efforts to end the fighting.

That appears to leave very little for previous priorities identified at the evidence session, including health and nutrition, providing clean water, education and child protection.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in