Troubled Stonehenge 'lacks magic'

Cahal Milmo
Friday 03 November 2006 01:00
Comments

Thomas Hardy was so moved by Stonehenge's bleak beauty he called it "a very Temple of the Winds". Modern admirers are more likely to describe it as "a mess" and be moved only by a tide of tourists.

The neolithic stones on Salisbury Plain were criticised yesterday as "over-loved" and "lacking magic" in a survey of conditions at 94 leading World Heritage Sites. The study by 400 conservation and tourism experts for National Geographic ranked Stonehenge 75th in the list of destinations and declared it to be "in moderate trouble".

Researchers said that the 5,000-year-old monument was being degraded by large numbers of people on the site and the proximity of two busy roads.

One judge wrote: "Massive numbers of tourists cycle through the site on a daily basis, making for a crowded, noisy environment. Condition of the site is protected by fencing... but the visual sightlines are disrupted. It does not appear that local populations benefit from the tourist development of the site."

Another wrote: "What a mess. Compelling, over-loved. Certainly, the current experience lacks magic."

The heritage "scorecard", compiled by George Washington University in Washington DC, gave Stonehenge 56 points out of a possible 100. The Taj Mahal also scored 56 points, the Great Wall of China 55 points and the Acropolis 53 points.

Kathmandhu Valley in Nepal, described as "polluted" and scarred by "modern concrete buildings", came bottom with 39 points. The West Fjords in Norway came top with 87 points.

The two other British sites in the survey, published in National Geographic Traveller magazine, fared much better than Stonehenge. Bath was ranked joint sixth with 78 points and Dorset's Jurassic Coast scored 70.

But while the criticism of Stonehenge, which last year received 800,000 visitors , may dismay tourism chiefs, it was welcomed by its owners. English Heritage, which has seen its plans for a £67m revamp repeatedly delayed, agreed that the site had "lost some of its magic".

The conservation organisationwants to persuade the Government to approve a new underground visitor centre and remove all traffic from the area.

How other attractions fared

City of Bath Score: 78

"A beautifully presented World Heritage town. High-quality maintenance."

"What is remarkable is the human scale of everything, from its many museums and walks to cultural events, shops and restaurants."

Jurassic Coast Score: 70

"Well managed, although the popularity of the coastal walks leads to... "people pollution". At busy times there are convoys of walkers."

"Some of the tourism development seems inappropriate, for example, cliff-top caravan parks."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in