No-fault divorce law ‘hallelujah moment’ for couples who seek amicable split

From Wednesday, couples will be able to separate without apportioning blame as no-fault divorce legislation comes into force.

A pair of wedding rings (Anthony Devlin/PA)
A pair of wedding rings (Anthony Devlin/PA)

Campaigners have heralded the biggest shake up of divorce law in half a century as a “hallelujah moment” for couples wishing split amicably.

From Wednesday, married couples in England and Wales will be able to start proceedings without apportioning blame as no-fault divorce legislation comes into force.

Campaigners say it will help couples move forward, rather than dredge up the past, and enable them to secure the best outcome for their family without unnecessary conflict.

Stuart Ruff, partner at the south London and Kent law firm Thackray Williams, said: “This is the legal watershed that couples have been desperately waiting for.

“It is truly a hallelujah moment and will save couples untold pain of having to blame somebody for a divorce.”

Tini Owens, whose case sparked the campaign for a law change almost four years ago, called the move an “important milestone”.

She lost a Supreme Court fight in 2018 after failing to convince judges that her 40-year marriage should end.

She said: “No-one should have to remain in a loveless marriage or endure a long, drawn out and expensive court battle to end it.

“This change in the law guards against that happening and I welcome it.”

Her solicitor, Simon Beccle – partner at Payne Hicks Beach, said the change “does not come soon enough”.

He said: “In addition to reducing potential conflict by removing the issue of blame from the divorce law, there are lots of positives to be taken from the new law, not least in allowing joint applications for divorce for the first time, removing the ability of one spouse to defend a divorce and simplifying the divorce terminology and language.”

Anyone thinking this law change will usher in “quickie divorces” would be mistaken, he said, as there is a minimum 20 weeks between starting proceedings and applying for a conditional order, and a further six-week period before divorce is granted.

Until this week in England and Wales, unless someone could prove there was adultery, unreasonable behaviour or desertion, the only way to obtain a divorce without their spouse’s agreement was to live apart for five years.

The online divorce service Amicable said the move signals a “huge narrative shift to separation” and will go some way to healing the “blame-laden” system

Co founder Kate Daly said the group “fiercely contest” claims that the new legislation will undermine the sanctity of marriage, instead saying it enables divorce to be achieved “in a less punishing, more collaborate way”.

Elspeth Kinder, partner and head of family law at JMW Solicitors, said there is likely to be a temporary spike in applications because some couples have delayed acting until the rules change.

She said couples applying for divorce together “may well become the standard process as lawyers seek to minimise conflict” and the new legislation will “massively speed up” the process for couples who previously would have elected to divorce on the basis of two years’ separation.

The National Family Mediation charity said it is preparing for what it expects to be its busiest month ever, with its mediators ready for a “flood of enquiries”.

Experts warned the move could bring some unintended consequences.

The minimum 20-week wait “will irritate many”, warned Sarah Anticoni, partner at Charles Russell Speechlys.

She added: “Divorce lawyers have rightly spent years lobbying for the end of the often-toxic ‘blame game’.

“However, if couples no longer articulate the demise of their marriage in this way, it is unclear where the feelings of loss, grief and anger will manifest themselves.

“This may need to be addressed through other services, including counselling.”

Groups also called for more support for children whose parents split up.

The Family Solutions Group welcomed the introduction of no-fault divorces but said it is “only one part of the jigsaw”, calling for more help to reduce conflict for children whose parents are separating.

The Positive Parenting Alliance said the positive move is “far from the great leap forward that’s needed to provide the fundamental changes required to safeguard the mental health of children around parental breakdown”.

Founder James Hayhurst said: “Now we need to start thinking very differently and more broadly about the whole issue of relationship breakdown and divorce, which should be treated as an urgent health and wellbeing issue – for both parents and children.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in