Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Which? labels packaging on food as 'unreliable

CONSUMERISM

Glenda Cooper
Thursday 05 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Nutritional information on food labels should be taken with a pinch of salt according to the Consumers' Association.

Of 70 products tested in a survey not one label was completely correct and only one in 10 contained nutrients in the exact quantities stated. Nearly half had errors of more than 10 per cent - the margin allowed by trading standards officials.

The report published in Which? magazine said laboratory tests found that labels on Marks & Spencer ice cream were found to be 72 per cent out in their measurements of fat levels while Somerfield baked beans contained only half the fibre declared.

Heinz Weight Watchers baked beans contained 72 calories per 100g, not the 56 stated on the pack, it claimed.

Which? managing editor, Charlotte Ganne, said: "Nutritional labelling is not much help to consumers if it is not accurate. The quality of information must be better so shoppers are not misled."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in