Charles Lieber: Harvard professor found guilty of hiding ties to China

Professor’s attorney had argued that prosecution didn’t have any proof of charges

Maroosha Muzaffar
Wednesday 22 December 2021 15:29
Comments
<p>Charles Lieber, who is battling cancer, sat silently as the verdict was announced on Tuesday </p>

Charles Lieber, who is battling cancer, sat silently as the verdict was announced on Tuesday

A federal jury in Boston has found 62-year-old Harvard professor Charles Lieber guilty of making false statements to authorities and hiding his ties to China.

On Tuesday, the prosecutors said that the renowned nanoscientist and former chairman of Harvard’s chemistry department, in his quest for a Nobel Prize in 2011, agreed to become a “strategic scientist” at the Wuhan University of Technology in China.

The prosecution added that he participated in a Chinese recruitment drive called the Thousand Talents Program, and that China uses this programme to recruit foreign researchers so that they share their knowledge with them. They clarified that even though participating in the programme was not a crime, Mr Lieber lied to authorities when inquired about his involvement.

Mr Lieber pleaded not guilty to two counts of filing false tax returns, two counts of making false statements, and two counts of failing to file reports for a foreign bank account in China.

The Harvard professor’s attorney, Marc Mukasey, had argued that the prosecution didn’t have any proof of the charges. He also accused the investigators of not keeping any record of their interviews with his client prior to his arrest.

Mr Mukasey had also said that Mr Lieber “wasn’t charged with illegally transferring any technology or proprietary information to China” and that prosecutors would be unable to prove that Mr Lieber acted “knowingly, intentionally, or wilfully, or that he made any material false statement”.

On Tuesday, Mr Lieber, who is battling cancer, sat silently as the verdict was announced following nearly three hours of jury deliberations and a six-day trial.

Mr Mukasey said: “We respect the verdict and will keep up the fight.”

In January 2020, Mr Lieber was charged as part of the US Department of Justice’s so-called “China Initiative”. He has been on paid administrative leave from Harvard since being arrested then.

Prosecutors claim that the professor deliberately hid his ties to China and his involvement in China’s Thousand Talents Plan. He was also accused of hiding his income from the programme —  including $50,000 a month from the Wuhan University of Technology, up to $158,000 in living expenses and more than $1.5 million in grants.

Mr Lieber in exchange agreed to publish articles, organise international conferences and apply for patents on behalf of the Chinese university, the prosecution said.

Additional reporting by agencies

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in