Injured army veteran pushes back after his image is used in anti-Trump ‘propaganda’

Louise Hall
Wednesday 09 September 2020 18:50
Comments
Injured vet hits out at bloggers for using his article in Trump stories
Leer en Español

A US Army veteran has hit out at social media users for using photographs of him in attacks against president Donald Trump’s alleged comments on veterans.

The controversy comes following a report byThe Atlantic that the president had made derogatory remarks about lost service members and prisoners of war. Mr Trump has fiercely denied the article’s claims. 

Posts began circulating on social media using the image of Bobby Henline, lone survivor out of five soldiers in an IED blast in Iraq, hitting out at the president’s alleged comments, the veteran told Fox News in an interview.

“And they're using that to sell something that they believe in for their agenda. It's not fair to put us [veterans] as props in the middle of all that,” Mr Henline, a four-tour Iraq War veteran told the broadcaster.

I'm just so irritated that they put my image up there because now it looks like the president called me a loser."

Mr Henline is seeking to have the posts taken down as he believes people are wrongly using his image to further a political agenda that the accusations against the president are false.

“I really believe the president didn't say this," he said. "There’s been anonymous sources and other sources in the room that aren’t necessarily friends with the president or believe in his ways, but they're still not gonna slam him and make up this rumor and keep it spreading. And so with that said, I don't think he really said this."

One of the images circulating appears to show Mr Henline with a banner reading, “Trump says he’s a ‘loser.’ I say he’s a hero! What do you say?"

Mr Henline, a motivational speaker and a comedian, said he was quickly made aware of the posts circulating on social media and quickly took to Instragram to condemn the use of his person image insisting users “stop using me for your propaganda."

While Mr Henline said that he was successful in getting some of the posts taken down, he said that more have been published in their place.

The Atlantic’s article, which has drawn outrage from Mr Trump and his supporters, draws on multiple anonymous sources detailing a number of unflattering alleged incidents surrounding the president involving war dead.

“What animal would say that?” Mr Trump said in response to the accusations as he arrived back in Washington after a campaign stop on Thursday.  

A number of the president’s supporters, who have put themselves in the room where some of the reported comments were allegedly said, have publicly denied the accusations.

Former national security adviser John Bolton and Former White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders have both gone on the record saying the comments are false.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in