Georgia 'heartbeat' law: State passes bill banning abortions before many women know they are pregnant

Democrats bring in wire hangers to highlight risk of unsafe home terminations

Republican Ed Setzler wrote the bill
Republican Ed Setzler wrote the bill

Legislators in Georgia's House of Representatives have passed a bill that could ban most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.

The bill aims to outlaw terminations carried out after a foetal heartbeat is detected. Similar restrictions are under consideration in Mississippi, Florida, Kentucky, Ohio and South Carolina.

During a tense debate on Thursday several Democratic legislators, who oppose the restrictions, turned their back on the bill's Republican author, Ed Setzler.

Earlier in the day some Democrats had brought in wire coat hangers, in reference to unsafe home abortions.

Women in Georgia currently have the right to undergo an abortion up to 20 weeks into a pregnancy.

But a foetal heartbeat is generally detected at around six weeks, before many women know they are pregnant.

Mr Setzler claimed that the bill sought "to recognise that the child in the womb, that is living distinct from their mother, has a right to life that is worthy of legal protection."

The Tennessee House of Representatives passed similar legislation earlier on Thursday after tense debate.

If the heartbeat bill is passed by Georgia's state Senate and signed into law, it will almost certainly trigger legal challenges.

But anti-abortion activists hope that such a challenge will lead to the US Supreme Court reversing Roe vs Wade, especially with new conservative justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh sitting on the court.

Roe vs Wade, a 1973 court case, established a nationwide right to abortion in the US.

Renitta Shannon, a Democratic politician in Georgia, spoke against the bill and discussed her own abortion during Thursday's debate.

"Let's be clear, no matter what kind of law you pass to outlaw abortions, women will continue to seek and have abortions," she said.

Ms Shannon discussed the unsafe abortion options available before Roe vs Wade but was cut off for running over her allocated time.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

She remained on the floor until colleagues surrounded her, imploring her to walk away.

Mike Wilensky, a Democrat, also spoke against the bill.

"We know that this bill is unconstitutional. We know that there are going to be huge costs to litigate this," he said.

The fast-tracked bill came to the floor in the final minutes before a legislative deadline by which bills must generally pass out of one house or the other to be considered.

After it was passed, Democrats and abortion rights activists said they would continue to fight the bill and for safe access to abortion in Georgia.

Additional reporting by agencies

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in