Ghislaine Maxwell trial on sex-trafficking charges delayed to the fall

New charges require ‘substantial amount of discovery that is now potentially relevant’, the court says

Ghislaine Maxwell pleads not guilty to sex trafficking charges
Leer en Español

The trial of Ghislaine Maxwell on allegations of trafficking teenage girls for Jeffrey Epstein has been postponed to the fall.

In delaying the previously scheduled start from 12 July, US District Judge Alison Nathan said the move was appropriate due to new charges being added in March and the Covid-19 pandemic hindering trial preparations.

Ms Maxwell pleaded not guilty in April to new indictments during her first in-person court appearance since being arrested on sex trafficking charges.

Her defence team requested the postponement as the new indictment, which added a victim and extended the timeframe of the allegations, superseded the previous charges, to which Ms Maxwell also pleaded not guilty.

The court ruled against the defence’s request to delay until January 2022, but agreed that the additional charges and increased time frame of the alleged conspiracy required “a substantial amount of discovery that is now potentially relevant”.

Prosecutors had opposed the delay, arguing it was unnecessary as the defence had successfully split the charges into two trials, one on the sex-trafficking allegations and the other on whether she committed perjury by denying them while under oath.

“As the government indicated in explaining the delay in filing the new charges, travel constraints and other safety concerns resulting from the pandemic have slowed trial preparation and complicated the logistics of conducting investigations,” Ms Nathan added in the ruling.

In ruling that the adjournment be no longer than necessary, she noted that Ms Maxwell remains detained pre-trial.

The court has denied several requests for bail by Ms Maxwell’s defence team ahead of the trial start date, with attorney Bobbi Sternheim writing in a court filing she is being deprived of sleep, along with a photo showing an unexplained black eye.

Attorney David Markus said previously that Ms Maxwell was “hanging in there” but was suffering the “Epstein effect” of being constantly monitored by wellness checks.

"I’ve never seen anything like how she’s being treated. It’s the Epstein effect. It’s the Epstein effect. She’ been treated horribly because of the negligence and what happened to Jeffrey Epstein."

Ms Nathan ordered both prosecutors and defence counsel to propose a fall trial date by next Monday, 10 May.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in