Apple loses nearly £700,000 in iPhone return scam carried out by two students, prosecutors say

Close to 1,500 warranty claims were approved to the same person

Rick Rojas
Sunday 07 April 2019 18:28
Comments
Moment President Trump calls Tim Cook 'Tim Apple'

The con was simple. Send a fake iPhone to Apple claiming the device would not turn on and that it was under warranty – and not long after a replacement arrived in the post.

It was a scheme that federal prosecutors said two college students in Oregon repeated on such a scale that it amounted to nearly $900,000 (£690,000) in losses for Apple as they sent in hundreds of counterfeit phones.

The two students, identified as Quan Jiang and Yangyang Zhou, would then ship the iPhones overseas where they would be sold for hundreds of dollars and, in return, they would get a cut of the profit, according to court documents recently filed in a US district court in Oregon.

The investigation started two years ago after customs officials seized several shipments coming from Hong Kong containing mobile phones from China.

The devices appeared to be Apple products, with the logos and design features of an iPhone, but the shipping methods and packaging raised the suspicions of officials who determined that the phones were counterfeit, authorities said.

Investigators discovered that the hones were bound for Mr Zhou’s address and were part of an importing operation that included Mr Jiang, Mr Zhou’s neighbour in Corvallis, Oregon, about 85 miles south of Portland.

Records provided to investigators by Apple allowed them to connect Mr Jiang to 3,069 iPhone warranty claims through his name and his email, postal address and IP addresses. All of them indicated “No Power/Wired Charging Issues” as the reason for the claim.

More than 1,500 of the claims were rejected, but nearly just as many were approved, with a new phone sent out.

An Apple representative told an investigator, according to court records, that a key element of the scheme’s success was that the phones were inoperable, which meant the replacement process would begin before technicians could figure out they were counterfeit.

Mr Jiang told investigators in an interview he had submitted some 2,000 phones in 2017. He also said he employed friends and relatives in the United States to help swap out the phones.

He said an associate in China who sold the genuine phones paid Mr Jiang’s mother, who lives in China; she deposited the money in a bank account that he could access in the United States.

With each phone costing $600 (£460), the losses for Apple amounted to $895,800 (£687,070), officials said.

Apple, which did not respond to a request for comment on Saturday, is not the only technology giant that has been targeted by scammers.

A Lithuanian man recently pleaded guilty to an effort in which he sought to bill Facebook and Google out of millions of dollars by submitting fraudulent invoices to the companies.

Prosecutors said that from 2013 to 2015 the companies wired more than $100m (£76m) to the man and his associates.

In Apple’s case, both of the men named in court records are Chinese citizens who were lawfully in the United States on student visas.

Turner Prize winner: iPhone film maker Charlotte Prodger

Mr Jiang was finishing studies in electrical engineering at Linn-Benton Community College in Albany, Oregon, and Mr Zhou was an engineering student at Oregon State University in Corvallis.

Mr Jiang is accused of trafficking in counterfeit goods and wire fraud, and he is under GPS monitoring, officials said. Mr Zhou is accused of submitting false or misleading information on an export declaration.

He made his first court appearance on Friday and was ordered to not have any contact with Apple while the case continues.

Mr Jiang’s lawyer declined to comment on Saturday.

Mr Zhou’s lawyer did not respond to a message seeking comment, but the lawyer, Jamie Kilberg, told The Oregonian, the Portland newspaper that first reported the allegations, “we do believe that Mr Zhou will be vindicated”.

In 2018 federal agents searched Mr Jiang’s house where they found more than 300 fake iPhones and shipping and warranty submission records.

Investigators found, through company records, more than a dozen warranty returns under Mr Zhou’s name and address. More than 200 other total warranty claims were made using his name or derivations of it and other addresses linked to him, prosecutors said.

In August, federal agents stopped Mr Zhou at San Francisco international airport when he was about to leave for China, according to an affidavit filed in federal court. Among his possessions was an iPhone in like-new condition and still in a factory box.

An investigator from the Department of Homeland Security said he could tell from the box that it had come from Apple’s warranty replacement process.

But Mr Zhou told the agent it was new and given to him by Mr Jiang as payment for a debt.

The New York Times

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in