Ivanka Trump brand sales plummeted at Nordstrom in weeks before election

The president claimed his daughter was treated 'so unfairly' 

Ms Trump styled her own clothes at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland
Ms Trump styled her own clothes at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland

Donald Trump has always promoted himself as a cold, shrewd operator.

If the deal is no good, then forget it. The world of business is no place for emotions.

So after the president made an excitable intervention over a clothing chain’s decision to drop his daughter’s clothing line, he may have been surprised to learn the items were not selling well at all. The Trump brand may not be what it once was.

A report in the Wall Street Journal said sales of Ivanka Trump’s line of clothes and accessories fell by nearly a third in the past financial year, with a sharp drop off in the weeks before her father was elected president.

Nordstrom announced this week it had decided to stop carrying Ms Trump's apparel, prompting her father to defend her. “My daughter Ivanka has been treated so unfairly by Nordstrom,” he said on Twitter.

Trump considers "brand new" travel ban

The Journal cited internal Nordstrom data as showing sales of Ms Trump’s products were more than 70 per cent lower in the second, third and fourth week of October compared to the same weeks the previous year. The election was on November 8.

Nordstrom had $14.3m in sales in the fiscal year that ended in January, down from $20.9m in the previous year, the Journal reported.

Nordstrom spokeswoman Tara Darrow said the retailer did not provide the newspaper with data on the sales of Ms Trump’s line. “We have not and will not share specific sales results numbers related to this brand or any other brand,” she told Reuters.

A second clothing chain, Neiman Marcus, also dropped the line.

“Neiman Marcus has a very small Ivanka Trump precious jewelry business which is comprised 100 per cent of consigned merchandise (merchandise owned by the vendor). Based on productivity we continuously assess whether our brands are carried in stores, on our website, or both,” said a spokesperson.

In addition to the president, others in the administration expressed support for Ivanka Trump's business.

Senior White House adviser, Kellyanne Conway, was accused of violating ethics rules after she went on television to urge people to buy Ms Trump’s products in what she told viewers of Fox News was “a free commercial”.

Republican Jason Chaffetz, chairman of the House of Representatives Oversight committee, said he had asked the Office of Government Ethics to review Ms Conway’s comments and recommend disciplinary action against her if warranted.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in