Jeffrey Epstein: Evidence against billionaire paedophile growing ‘stronger by the day’, prosecutors say
More women reportedly coming forward with allegations against sex offender
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Federal prosecutors, preparing for a bail fight on Monday, have said evidence against financier Jeffrey Epstein is growing "stronger by the day" after several more women contacted them in recent days to say he abused them when they were underage.
Prosecutors have said Epstein is a flight risk and danger to the community, and should remain incarcerated until he is tried on charges that he recruited and abused dozens of underage girls in New York and Florida in the early 2000s.
His lawyers countered that their client has not committed crimes since pleading guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution charges in Florida in 2008 and that the federal government is reneging on a 12-year-old deal not to prosecute him.
They said he should be allowed to await trial under house arrest in his $77m (£61m) Manhattan mansion, with electronic monitoring.
In a written submission on Friday to US District Judge Richard M Berman, prosecutors revealed new information about their investigation and why they perceive Epstein as dangerous.
They said several additional women in multiple jurisdictions had identified themselves to the government, claiming Epstein abused them when they were minors. Also, dozens of individuals have called the government to report information about Epstein and the charges he faces, prosecutors said.
Prosecutors said they believe Epstein might have tried to influence witnesses after discovering that he had paid a total of $350,000 to two individuals, including a former employee, in the last year.
That came after the Miami Herald reported the circumstances of his state court conviction in 2008, which led to a 13-month jail term and his deal to avoid federal prosecution.
"This course of action, and in particular its timing, suggests the defendant was attempting to further influence co-conspirators who might provide information against him in light of the recently re-emerging allegations," prosecutors said.
The decade-old secret plea deal led to labour secretary Alexander Acosta's resignation last week.
Mr Acosta came under renewed criticism following Epstein's arrest over the 2008 non-prosecution agreement he oversaw as the US attorney in Miami.
In addition to the charges in the indictment, prosecutors are also reviewing dozens of electronic files seized during a raid on Epstein's residence after his 6 July arrest, finding even more photos than the hundreds of pictures of nude and seminude young women and girls they had reported prior to a court hearing a week ago.
In their submission to the judge, Epstein's lawyers said their client has had a clean record since he began registering as a sex offender after his Florida conviction.
They said the accusations against Epstein are "outside the margins of federal criminal law" and do not constitute sex trafficking since there were no allegations he "trafficked anybody for commercial profit; that he forced, coerced, defrauded, or enslaved anybody."
Prosecutors said efforts by defence lawyers to characterise Epstein's crimes as "simple prostitution" were "not only offensive but also utterly irrelevant given that federal law does not recognise the concept of a child prostitute — there are only trafficking victims — because a child cannot legally consent to being exploited."
Associated Press
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments