Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyers try to use hunting laws to defend him having a gun

‘They can submit evidence that the defendant ... was engaged in legal hunting on the streets of Kenosha that night,’ prosecutors responded. ‘I don’t think they really want to do that.’

Nathan Place
New York
Friday 08 October 2021 17:08
Comments

Judge Denies Request For Evidence In Rittenhouse Trial

As Kyle Rittenhouse’s murder trial fast approaches, his lawyers have tried to dismiss one of the charges against him by invoking local hunting laws.

Mr Rittenhouse was 17 when he allegedly shot three people, killing two of them, during a 2020 protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin. He was charged with multiple felonies, including homicide, and one misdemeanor: possession of a deadly weapon by a person under 18.

Mr Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

On Tuesday, the teen’s attorneys tried to get the misdemeanor dismissed by citing a Wisconsin hunting statute, the Chicago Tribune reported. That statute requires supervision and training for anyone under 17 to use a gun while hunting.

However, defense attorney Corey Chirafisi argued, “There appears to be an exception for 17-year-olds.”

Prosecutors dared the defense to follow that argument all the way through.

“They can submit evidence that the defendant had a certificate to hunt and he was engaged in legal hunting on the streets of Kenosha that night,” Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger told the court. “I don’t think they really want to do that.”

Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder said he was open to reviewing the statutes, but did not dismiss the charge.

“I don’t feel comfortable making a ruling,” the judge said. “The basic concept is the rule... has to be clear to ordinary people.”

On the night of the shootings, Mr Rittenhouse was carrying a semi-automatic rifle similar to an AR-15. At the time, Kenosha was in the midst of raucous protests over the police shooting of Jacob Blake, and Mr Rittenhouse said he needed the gun to protect himself while defending local businesses.

At some point that night, Mr Rittenhouse is accused of shooting and killing Joseph Rosenbaum, who defense lawyers say had been chasing him. After the shooting, Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz approached the teen, and Mr Rittenhouse allegedly shot them as well. Mr Huber died, and Mr Grosskreutz was seriously wounded. Mr Rittenhouse’s lawyers say he acted in self-defense.

The shootings were deeply polarizing for the country. Many conservatives supported Mr Rittenhouse, portraying him a patriot who tried to guard his community from violent protests. Others called the teen a murderer.

Jury selection for Mr Rittenhouse’s trial is scheduled to begin on 1 November.

The Independent has reached out to Mr Rittenhouse’s lawyers for comment, but has not heard back yet.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in