Couple who waved guns at St Louis protesters sue news photographer

Mark and Patrcia McCloskey argue that photo led to ‘significant national recognition and infamy’

James Crump
Sunday 08 November 2020 21:55
Comments
Couple point guns at protesters in St Louis

A St Louis couple facing felony charges for waving guns at Black Lives Matter protesters who marched near to their home have alleged that a photographer trespassed onto their property to capture the confrontation.

Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who are both attorneys in their 60s, filed a lawsuit in the St Louis Circuit Court against photographer Bill Greenblatt and United Press International, who provided the photo for publications.

The McCloskeys are also suing Redbubble, an online marketplace for print-on-demand products that has carried merchandise featuring the image of the couple.

On 28 June, during Black Lives Matter protests that followed the death of African American man George Floyd while in the custody of Minneapolis police, a few hundred protesters walked onto the private street in St Louis, Missouri, where the couple’s $1.15m (£873,515m) home is located.

As the protesters walked past their home, Mr McCloskey walked outside carrying an AR-15 rifle, while Ms McCloskey held a semiautomatic handgun.

As the confrontation took place, Mr Greenblatt took a picture of the couple toting their guns at the Black Lives Matter protesters, which quickly gained national attention during a summer of protests about racial injustice.

Although photographers are allowed to take photographs on public rights of way, the couple have argued that because the street is private, the protesters and Mr Greenblatt were trespassing.

In the lawsuit, they argued that the photo led to “significant national recognition and infamy,” after the incident was covered nationally.

The couple have also argued that Mr Greenblatt, United Press International and Redbubble have profited from “t-shirts, masks, and other items, and licensing use of photographs bearing Plaintiffs’ likenesses, without obtaining Plaintiffs’ consent.”

Mr and Ms McCloskey said that merchandise on the site has often included “mocking and pejorative taglines or captions,” which has caused them “humiliation, mental anguish, and severe emotional distress.”

The couple received support from Donald Trump earlier in the year, and later spoke during the first night of the Republican National Convention in August where they complained about being charged. The couple have become heroes to some conservatives.

After the confrontation in June, the couple were arrested, and they subsequently pleaded not guilty to unlawful use of a weapon and evidence tampering at a hearing earlier this year.

The Independent has contacted Redbubble and United Press International for comment. 

Additional reporting by the Associated Press

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in