Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

More embarrassment for New York Post after it wrongly identifies Boston bombing pair on front page

 

Rob Hastings
Friday 19 April 2013 18:10 BST
Comments
A section of the New York Post front page that appeared to wrongly identify two men as suspects in the Boston marathon bombing
A section of the New York Post front page that appeared to wrongly identify two men as suspects in the Boston marathon bombing

A newspaper front page that wrongly identified two innocent men as the prime suspects in the Boston marathon bombing has renewed embarrassment for the New York Post newspaper, just days after it erroneously reported that 12 people had died in the incident when the death toll was in fact three.

Showing the two false suspects with a full-page photo and the headline “BAG MEN,” the tabloid owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation told its readers: “Feds seek these two pictured at Boston marathon.”

Despite the two men soon being cleared as having played no part in the plot and never having been key to the investigation, the newspaper maintained that its story was essentially true as police were indeed initially analysing CCTV images of many marathon spectators with backpacks, including the two men in the photo. But the front cover has been heavily criticised by commentators who argued that it presented the two men as if they had been positively identified as the key suspects in the bombing.

The New York Post’s Editor-in-Chief, Col Allan, said in a statement: “We stand by our story. The image was emailed to law enforcement agencies yesterday afternoon seeking information about these men, as our story reported. We did not identify them as suspects.” The newspaper has also blamed police for telling its reporters on the day of the bombing that up to 12 may have died, though every other media outlet accurately stuck to two or three in their reported death tolls.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in