Nazi Porsche fails to sell amid $70m auction sale price blunder

Buyers not put off by fact car symbolises Nazi power

Alessio Perrone
Monday 19 August 2019 11:04
Comments

A car symbolising the rise of the Nazis in the 1930s has failed to sell at a California auction – but the failure had nothing to do with ethical reasons and was due instead to a price blunder.

Auction house RM Sotheby’s was unable to find a buyer for the “Porsche” Type 64 on Saturday night in Monterey, California after the sale was mired in controversy.

The car was designed by Ferdinand Porsche in 1939 upon request by the National Socialist Motor Corps (NSKK).

NSKK chief Adolf Huehnlein commissioned the car in the hope it would win a race from Berlin to Rome, which was meant to be a celebration of the fascist alliance between Italy and Germany

But the race never took place after World War Two broke out in 1939.

But the dark past of the Type 64 reportedly played no part in putting off prospective buyers at the California auction over the weekend.

The car failed to sell after RM Sotheby's committed the “biggest blunder in recent auction history”, according to Bloomberg, with the auction house announcing bids had reached $70 million (£57.75m) instead of $17m (£14m).

At that point, people stopped bidding, booed and walked off.

The car’s name also caused controversy. RM Sotheby’s advertised the Type 64 as a Porsche, but many dispute the naming, claiming that the tag “Porsche” was added to the car years later.

The first car sold as a Porsche was the 356 model in 1948.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in