President Obama will veto bill allowing 9/11 families to sue Saudi Arabia, White House spokesman confirms

Josh Earnest says the bill will open up US citizens to lawsuits from all over the world

The families of the nearly 3,000 victims want to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged complicity
The families of the nearly 3,000 victims want to sue Saudi Arabia for its alleged complicity

Barack Obama is set to veto a bill that would allow the survivors and victims of 9/11 to sue Saudi Arabia.

In his daily briefing to reporters, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said: "It's not hard to imagine other countries using this law as an excuse to haul US diplomats or US service members or even US companies into courts all around the world.

"I do anticipate the president would veto this legislation when it is presented to him."

On Friday, the House of Representatives approved a bill passed by the Senate in May which would allow the families of the nearly 3,000 people who died in the terror attacks on the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Pennsylvania on 11 September 2001 to sue for damages.

Fifteen of the 19 men who hijacked four planes and flew them into targets in New York and Washington in 2001 were Saudi citizens, though Riyadh has always denied having any role in the attacks.

9/11 remembered 15 years on

Families of the victims have filed various lawsuits directed at members of the Saudi royal family and charities associated with them, accusing them of allegedly supporting terrorism.

But these moves have been blocked by a 1976 law which gives foreign nations immunity from lawsuits in US courts.

The bill is designed to create an exception if foreign countries are found at least partially responsible for terror attacks which kill American citizens within the US.

Under the US Constitution, Mr Obama has 10 days to veto the bill or it automatically becomes law but congressional aides claim the measure has enough support, two-thirds majority in both the Senate and the House, for them to override the Presidential veto for the first time since Mr Obama came to power in January 2009.

But Mr Obama could also use what is called a “pocket veto” - where he sits on a bill under the Congressional session ends - as lawmakers are due to leave Washington this week in order to prepare for the national elections on 8 November.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in