Obamagate: How a Michael Flynn case conspiracy theory became central to Trump’s reelection campaign

‘We sort of have the smoking gun because we now have the declassified document with Joe Biden’s name on it,’ Republican Senator Rand Paul says

Bill Barr on decision to drop Michael Flynn case

On the day Attorney General William Barr moved to drop criminal charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn — again winning the adulation of Donald Trump, the US president — he was paid a special visit.

Richard Grenell, the acting director of national intelligence and one of Mr Trump’s most combative defenders, arrived last Thursday at the Justice Department’s headquarters clutching a brown leather briefcase. A Fox News camera was pre-positioned at the entrance on 10th Street NW, seemingly tipped off to record footage of the dramatic scene.

Mr Grenell carried a list he had declassified of former Obama administration officials, including former vice president Joe Biden, who had sought to remove the cloak of anonymity from references in intelligence documents that turned out to be of Mr Flynn. During a brief meeting with Mr Barr, Mr Grenell turned over the list of names, setting off a chain reaction that led Republican senators to publicly release it on Wednesday in what they claim is a monumental scandal.

The practice, known as unmasking, is commonplace in government. But in the case of Mr Flynn, Mr Trump and his allies used the list of names to claim Mr Obama, Mr Biden and their appointees deliberately sought to sabotage the incoming Trump administration as part of a long-running conspiracy they have dubbed “Obamagate.”

“We sort of have the smoking gun because we now have the declassified document with Joe Biden’s name on it,” Senator Rand Paul, Republican for Kentucky, said on Thursday.

Mr Biden’s campaign maintains that his actions were entirely appropriate and that the declassified document shows he followed normal intelligence procedures.

With Mr Trump suffering political damage for his management of the coronavirus pandemic less than six months before the election, the president’s government appointees and allies in Congress are using their powers to generate a political storm aimed at engulfing Mr Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, and Mr Obama, whom polls show is the nation’s most popular political figure, making him a potent threat to Mr Trump as a Biden surrogate.

Another objective is to rewrite the history of the Russia investigation as Trump has long sought, by casting Mr Flynn as a martyr wronged by nefarious bureaucratic elites.

These efforts are being amplified by wall-to-wall coverage on Fox News Channel and elsewhere in conservative media, where this week Flynn coverage has rivaled, and at times overshadowed, news about the pandemic, even as the US death toll from the novel coronavirus climbed past 85,000.

And in a remarkable turn on Thursday, Mr Trump urged Congress to call Obama to testify and even suggested those involved – including Mr Biden and two longtime Trump antagonists, former FBI director James Comey and former CIA director John Brennan – go to prison.

“I’m talking with 50-year sentences,” MrTrump said in an interview with Fox Business Network that aired Thursday. “It’s a disgrace what’s happened. This is the greatest political scam, hoax in the history of our country. . . . People should be going to jail for this stuff. “

Mr Trump added, “This was all Obama. This was all Biden. These people were corrupt – the whole thing was corrupt – and we caught them.”

Mr Biden has denied any wrongdoing. The newly revealed list shows that roughly three dozen government officials, including Biden, Brennan and Comey, may have received Flynn’s name in response to a request to reveal the identity of a US person anonymously identified in an intelligence report.

Mr Biden acknowledged attending a Jan. 5, 2017, Oval Office meeting with Obama and other officials at which the counterintelligence investigation into Flynn, then Trump’s designee for national security adviser, was discussed. But he said he knew nothing else about the topic when pressed Tuesday on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“This is all about diversion,” Mr Biden said, ascribing a motive to Trump. “This is a game this guy plays all the time. The country is in crisis. . . . He should stop trying to always divert attention from the real concerns of the American people.”

Mr Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said the unmasking list underscores “the breadth and depth of concern across the American government – including among career officials” about Mr Flynn’s interactions with officials from Russia and other foreign governments. Mr Bates also accused Republicans of abusing their government powers “to act as arms of the Trump campaign.”

Mr Trump has been distracted recently from managing the pandemic by fixating on Mr Flynn and related matters, ranting in private about the Russia investigation, complaining about Mr Comey and others in the FBI, and making clear he wanted to talk in the run-up to the election about law enforcement targeting him, according to one adviser who spoke with the president last week.

White House chief of staff Mark Meadows has been focused extensively on the Flynn situation and has discussed it regularly with Mr Trump, seeing it as vindication of his long-held skepticism toward the Russia probe, according to two senior administration officials.

Mr Paul framed the unmasking as an opportunity to counter the Democratic-led impeachment of Mr Trump for allegedly using his office to pressure the Ukrainian government to investigate Mr Biden.

“What it seems to indicate is that high-ranking members, including Joe Biden, used the power of government to go after a political rival – and if that storyline sounds familiar, well, we heard that sort of story line from the other side for over a year,” Mr Paul said.

Mr Trump has branded the saga “Obamagate,” a slogan he has tweeted or retweeted 14 times in the past five days. When asked Monday what crime he was accusing Mr Obama of having committed, Mr Trump could not say beyond “some terrible things happened.” Pressed a second time, Mr Trump admonished a Washington Post reporter for asking.

“You know what the crime is,” Mr Trump said. “The crime is very obvious to everybody. All you have to do is read the newspapers, except yours.”

“Obamagate” morphed in just one week from a fringe cause pushed on social media and podcasts by Mr Trump’s allies – including former National Security Council staffer Sebastian Gorka and conservative legal commentators Joseph diGenova and Victoria Toensing, among others – to a centrepiece of Mr Trump’s reelection message.

In Mr Trump’s political orbit, advisers had been quietly readying a renewed political war over the Russia probe for weeks, but the Justice Department’s move last on Thursday to drop charges against Mr Flynn flipped the switch.

“It’s a constitutional scandal because all of these people acting together at the Obama Justice Department, the FBI, and the CIA decided they were either going to prevent [Trump] from being elected,” diGenova said during an 29 April podcast. If that failed, Mr diGenova said the Obama team was determined to “frame Trump and make him look like a Russian agent. Nothing gets bigger than that. This is a kind of perfidy and sedition that should never be tolerated.”

Mr Flynn had pleaded in 2017 to lying to the FBI, admitting multiple times in court, under oath, that he was guilty of the crime. But as the months wore on, Mr Flynn changed his legal teams and went on the attack against the Justice Department – alleging a bevvy of misconduct, including that the agents who interviewed him had set him up to lie.

Mr Barr, acting on the recommendation of Jeff Jensen, the US attorney in St Louis, agreed to ask a judge to dismiss the charges. The department’s legal rationale – essentially, that the FBI did not have good reason to interview Mr Flynn in the first place and thus his misstatements were not relevant – was criticised by some legal observers as a contorted way of helping a Trump ally.

But the move won Mr Barr praise from Mr Trump and many on the right, who immediately sought to rewrite the narrative about Mr Flynn – whom Mr Trump said he had fired as national security chief because he had lied to Mike Pence, the vice president, as well as to the FBI – and hailed him instead as a hero.

At the same time, other allies of the president were labouring to resurrect a long-dormant line of attack on the case: that intelligence officials in the Obama administration sought to remove the cloak of anonymity from references to Mr Flynn in intelligence documents.

Unmasking is common. Many intelligence documents are distributed with identities concealed to protect the privacy of US citizens, though certain officials can ask that the protection be removed to help them better understand what they are looking at.

Still, Mr Trump and his allies are attempting to turn it into a scandal.

“This is something Trump is very good at,” said Joyce White Vance, a former US attorney in the Obama administration. “He takes things that are the normal course of business – like, for instance, people who are authorised for unmasking so they can make sense of intelligence data – and turn them into something suspicious. It becomes an us-versus-them moment.”

Mr Grenell sent an email on 3 May about unmasking requests related to Mr Flynn to the National Security Agency, which routinely receives and approves thousands of unmasking requests each year, including during Mr Trump’s term. General Paul Nakasone, the NSA director, responded the next day with a list of US officials who may have received Mr Flynn’s name following a request to unmask it in an intelligence report.

There was no indication that the people who requested the unmasking knew that Mr Flynn’s name would be the one revealed. Nor, the NSA advised, was it clear that every official on the list actually saw a report with Mr Flynn’s name, or that they made the request themselves. Staffers often make unmasking requests on their bosses’ behalf, said people who have been involved in the process.

The list showed that a broad range of officials obtained information about Mr Flynn, from the CIA and the FBI to the Treasury Department and the US mission to the United Nations. Mr Biden, or possibly a staff member acting on his behalf, made his unmasking request that revealed Mr Flynn’s name on 12 January 2017.

The document does not make clear why Mr Biden or any other official had requested the unmasking in the first place, nor does it indicate that Mr Flynn had engaged in communications that alerted intelligence officials to investigate his contacts with foreigners.

Last Thursday, when Grenell showed up at the Justice Department to deliver the list to Mr Barr, the visit and Fox News’ apparent knowledge of it took some senior officials there aback. Mr Grenell, who had been ambassador to Germany before assuming the intelligence post on a temporary basis, has long associated with some of Mr Trump’s most vocal right-wing supporters and has earned plaudits from the president for his tweets attacking journalists.

Shortly after the visit, according to Justice Department officials, Mr Grenell’s office seemed to be intimating to reporters that it would be up to Mr Barr or his underlings to decide whether to release the document.

That, in the view of the Justice Department leadership, was not accurate, since the department did not create the document and Mr Grenell, not Mr Barr, had declassified it.

“The information is not ours to release,” Justice Department spokesman Kerri Kupec said on Tuesday on Fox News. She explained that Mr Grenell’s office “owns that document. They declassified that document. So if they choose to put that out there, they’re more than welcome to do so.”

Ultimately, Republican Senators Charles Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin asked for the list and then released it on Wednesday.

Mr Trump and his allies were prepared to pounce.

“Almost all of us who are involved or follow this have the facts of this case memorised,” said Rudy Giuliani, Mr Trump’s personal lawyer during the Russia investigation. “So it’s natural to want to talk about the requests to unmask Flynn and really look at whether these people were engaged in a conspiracy to get Flynn out.”

Conservative media in turn have been abuzz this week with anger about Mr Flynn’s treatment and criticism of US District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan, who is overseeing the Flynn case and must approve the dismissal of the charges. Judge Sullivan has appointed a retired federal judge to oppose the Justice Department’s position and explore where Mr Flynn should be held in contempt for lying to the court.

“The hatred for Donald J. Trump is as strong and intense as ever, and it is flavouring and directing and influencing what everybody in that town is saying and doing about virtually everything they’re saying and doing,” conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh told his listeners this week.

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett, whose books about the Russia probe have been touted by Trump, theorised on Thursday on “Fox & Friends” that the Obama administration went after Flynn “with a vengeance” because he had been determined to “expose the Russia hoax.”

Two people involved in Mr Trump’s reelection campaign said the effort was designed not only to weaken Biden, but also to tarnish Mr Obama, who is likely to be a visible surrogate for Mr Biden this fall. Mr Obama had the highest approval rating, at 60 per cent, of all living political figures tested in a recent Republican National Committee poll of voters in 17 battleground states. Biden and Pence tied for second at 47 percent.

Revealing the ways Mr Trump hopes to benefit politically from the issue, Mr Trump sent a fundraising plea to supporters on Thursday declaring, “Oh how the tables have turned.” After an investigation he dubbed “the Russian Collusion Delusion,” Mr Trump wrote, the unmasking list shows “Sleepy Joe is the GUILTY one.”

Also on Thursday, Mr Trump took to Twitter to urge Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham, Republican for South Carolina, to call Mr Obama to testify about the matter.

“He knew EVERYTHING,” Trump wrote. “Do it @LindseyGrahamSC, just do it. No more Mr. Nice Guy. No more talk!”

Mr Graham responded with a statement saying the committee would begin hearings on this and related matters in June, but that he is “greatly concerned about the precedent that would be set by calling a former president for oversight.”

“Both presidents are welcome to come before the committee and share their concerns about each other,” Mr Graham said. “If nothing else it would make for great television. However, I have great doubts about whether it would be wise for the country.

The Washington Post

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in