Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Alleged Pittsburgh synagogue shooter purchased guns legally despite antisemitic comments, inquiry finds

Among weapons owned by Robert Bowers were civilian version of military's primary combat rifle

Richard A. Oppel Jr
Wednesday 31 October 2018 18:46 GMT
Comments
President of Pittsburgh hospital treating Synagogue shooter: 'the noise was telling him his people were being slaughtered'

Accused synagogue gunman Robert Bowers, legally purchased the guns he used to kill 11 people in what is believed to be the deadliest attack against the Jewish community in the United States, federal authorities have said.

Investigators have said he used four guns — an AR-15 assault rifle and three Glock .357 handguns — in his shooting spree at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh.

An investigation has concluded that the guns were “acquired and possessed legally by Bowers,” the Philadelphia office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said.

Mr Bowers did not fall into any category barred from gun ownership under federal law, including felons, convicted domestic abusers, dishonourably discharged veterans, or people adjudicated to be mentally ill or subject to certain restraining orders.

He also had a handgun license, an ATF spokeswoman, Charlene Hennessy, said.

She added that the ATF’s investigation found that Mr Bowers owned 10 guns in total, all purchased and possessed legally: the four found at the synagogue; three handguns and two rifles recovered from his residence; and a shotgun recovered from his car outside the synagogue.

The shooting in Pittsburgh has prompted gun-control proponents to question whether someone so boiling with rage and religious hatred should have been able to acquire a small arsenal that included a civilian version of the military’s primary combat rifle.

Among other inflammatory statements he made online, Mr Bowers, 46, referred to someone who had criticised neo-Nazis as an “oven dodger” and he said “Jews are the children of Satan.”

Hours after the shooting, former President Barack Obama exhorted people to fight the rise of antisemitism and tweeted: “We have to stop making it so easy for those who want to harm the innocent to get their hands on a gun.”

There are no laws in Pennsylvania that would have prevented Mr Bowers from owning the guns, including the powerful assault weapon that confronted police who first responded to the shooting.

In 1993, the city councils of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia banned assault weapons within their city limits. But the state Legislature responded by passing a law that effectively repealed the ordinances.

A major push was also made this year in Pennsylvania to pass a so-called red flag law that would allow the police or relatives to petition a judge to temporarily take weapons away from people who appear to be a threat to themselves or others, even if they have not been adjudicated mentally ill.

A dozen states have enacted such laws, most of them after the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, that killed 17 people in February. But an effort to do so this year in Pennsylvania stalled after resistance from the National Rifle Association (NRA).

It is unclear whether any family members or law enforcement were aware of Mr Bowers’ antisemitic screeds on social media or his weapons. But gun-safety advocates say the nature of some recent acts of violence underscores the need for tighter firearms restrictions.

“When you combine heated, divisive political rhetoric with easy access to lethal weaponry, the possibility of these kinds of incidents happening is even more troubling,” said Adam Skaggs, the chief counsel of the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

President Donald Trump said he believed the nation’s gun laws had “little to do” with the shooting in Pittsburgh and suggested placing armed guards inside the synagogue might have prevented the massacre.

While the authorities have not provided other details of Mr Bowers’ rifle, the AR-15 is a civilian version of the military’s M16 and the M4 carbine, the primary combat weapons carried by soldiers and Marines.

The difference is that an AR-15 cannot fire in “burst” mode — which discharges three rounds with one trigger pull — or in full automatic mode, where the weapon fires until the trigger is released or the ammunition runs out. It fires one bullet at a time.

But it is a powerful weapon: light, easy to hold and to fire, with limited recoil, its bullets shooting out of the muzzle more than twice as fast as most handgun rounds. The standard AR-15 magazine holds 30 bullets and can be swapped out quickly, allowing a shooter to fire more than 100 rounds in minutes.

The AR-15 and its variants have become the gun of choice in the deadliest mass shootings in recent years. Congress outlawed the manufacture of assault weapons in 1994, but lawmakers allowed the ban to expire in 2004.

The power of the rifle used in the massacre was chillingly revealed in frantic calls over police radio as the killing unfolded.

“We’re under fire, we’re under fire. He’s got an automatic weapon. He’s firing out of the front of the synagogue,” came one call over the police radio. “We are pinned down by gunfire.”

Many shots were discharged inside, the authorities said.

“There were casings everywhere,” said Dr Karl Williams, the chief medical examiner of Allegheny County.

The New York Times

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in