Postal Service loses $2.2bn amid coronavirus pandemic as it faces growing pressure over mail-in voting

'Our financial position is dire, stemming from substantial declines in mail volume'

Louise Hall
Saturday 08 August 2020 00:18
Comments
US Postmaster General Louis Dejoy arrives at a meeting at the office of Speaker of the House Representative Nancy Pelosi at the US Capitol
US Postmaster General Louis Dejoy arrives at a meeting at the office of Speaker of the House Representative Nancy Pelosi at the US Capitol

The US postal service said it has lost $2.2bn in the three months running up to the end of June amid the coronavirus pandemic, with the postmaster general warning the agency is in a “dire” financial position.

The service has continued declines in first-class and business mail combined with increased costs due to PPE and staff changes, postmaster general Louis DeJoy told the postal board of governors at a meeting on Friday.

Mr DeJoy, the newly appointed leader of the service, stressed that without intervention from Congress, the agency faces an impending cash flow crisis.

“Our financial position is dire, stemming from substantial declines in mail volume, a broken business model and a management strategy that has not adequately addressed these issues,’’ Mr DeJoy said.

“Without dramatic change, there is no end in sight,’’ he added.

The agency has continued to incur financial losses that officials warn could top $20 billion over two years.

Later on Friday, Mr DeJoy said USPS has implemented a freeze on management hiring and is seeking approval for early retirement offers for non-union employees as part of a host of changes he said would improve efficiency and focus.

"By running our operations on time and on schedule, and by not incurring unnecessary overtime or other costs, we will enhance our ability to be sustainable and ... continue to provide high-quality, affordable service,'' Mr DeJoy said.

The comments come as Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said on Thursday that changes implemented by the postmaster general "threaten the timely delivery of mail – including medicines for seniors, paychecks for workers and absentee ballots for voters – that is essential to millions of Americans.’’

The criticism comes over fear that postal delays could threaten 2020 ballot deliveries in November’s election, which is expected to rely heavily on postal voting due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Mr DeJoy called election mail handling “a robust and proven process” in his remarks to the postal board, and said that “the Postal Service has ample capacity to deliver all election mail securely and on time in accordance with our delivery standards, and we will do so.”

“However ... we cannot correct the errors of (state and local) election boards if they fail to deploy processes that take our normal processing and delivery standards into account,” he said.

The Trump administration has been accused of trying to degrade the postal service ahead of the November elections in order to limit mail-in voting, which Mr Trump apparently fears will benefit Democrats rather than Republicans,

Additional reporting by agencies.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in