Elon Musk and Tesla illegally threatened employees, judge rules

Tweet by tech entrepreneur targeting pro-union employees among unlawful instances

Administrative law judge rules electric car company and Elon Musk violated US labour laws
Administrative law judge rules electric car company and Elon Musk violated US labour laws

Elon Musk's electric car company Tesla committed a series of violations of the United States’ National Labour Relations Act in 2017 and last year, a has judge ruled.

The electric-car maker illegally threatened and retaliated against employees, according to Amita Baman Tracy, an administrative law judge in California.

A tweet that Mr Musk sent in May 2018, which suggested employees who chose to join a union would give up company-paid stock options, was among the incidents the judge ruled were in violation of the law.

The judge’s order calls for Tesla to offer reinstatement and back-pay to a fired, pro-union employee, and to revoke a warning issued to another union supporter.

The ruling also calls for the company to hold a meeting at its assembly plant in Fremont, California, that Mr Musk must attend.

Either he or an agent with the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) must read a notice to employees informing them that the labour board concluded the company broke the law.

Representatives for Tesla, which had denied wrongdoing, did not immediately comment. The ruling was issued in response to complaints filed by the United Auto Workers union.

The judge’s ruling can be appealed to NLRB members who are presidential appointees based in Washington, a prospect that all sides have suggested is basically inevitable.

“This will be appealed no matter what I decide,” Ms Tracy said at one point during the trial last year in Oakland.

The NLRB is limited in its ability to punish companies found to have violated labour law.

While the agency can require that companies reinstate and pay back-wages to workers that were illegally fired, it can’t assess punitive damages or hold executives personally liable for violations.

Still, the judge’s ruling against Tesla offers grist to UAW supporters in making their case to workers and elected officials in California who have sought to tie electric vehicle subsidies to companies’ workplace practices.

“This entire trial is an infomercial in an effort to place Mr Musk and the company in a negative light,” Mark Ross, a Tesla attorney, said at the start of the proceedings in June 2018.

Bloomberg

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in