Trump to resurrect Reagan-era policy banning federally funded clinics from discussing abortion with women

Organisations such as Planned Parenthood would be barred from advising patients on how to seek terminations under new rules

Tom Barnes
Friday 18 May 2018 22:31
Comments
Abortion rights activists have claimed the ban will disrupt family planning services for women
Abortion rights activists have claimed the ban will disrupt family planning services for women

Donald Trump's administration has acted to bar taxpayer-funded family planning clinics from referring women for abortions.

The Health and Human Services Department sent its proposal to rewrite the rules to the White House, setting in motion a regulatory process that could take months.

Scant on details, an administration overview of the plan said it would echo a Reagan-era policy by banning abortion referrals by federally funded clinics and forbidding them from locating in facilities that also provide abortions.

Planned Parenthood, a principal provider of family planning, abortion services, and basic preventive care for women, said the plan appears designed to target the organisation.

"The end result would make it impossible for women to come to Planned Parenthood, who are counting on us every day," said the organisation's executive vice president, Dawn Laguens.

But presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway told Fox News the administration is simply recognizing "that abortion is not family planning. This is family planning money."

The law has been described as a “gag rule” by pro-choice campaigners and medical groups and is likely to trigger lawsuits attempting to block its implementation.

First introduced by Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, the rule never went into effect as written, although the Supreme Court deemed it was an appropriate use of executive power.

The policy was later scrapped under Bill Clinton and new laws were introduced, requiring clinics to provide “nondirective” counselling to include a range of options for women.

Organisations like Planned Parenthood, which receives huge amounts of federal funding through schemes such as the Title X family planning programme, are already blocked from using public money to pay for abortion procedures.

They may however use the cash to offer contraceptive services, screenings for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and counselling.

“This proposal does not necessarily defund Planned Parenthood, as long as they’re willing to disentangle taxpayer funds from abortion as a method of family planning, which is required by the Title X law,” a Trump administration official told CNN.

“Any grantees that perform, support, or refer for abortion have a choice – disentangle themselves from abortion or fund their activities with privately raised funds.”

Doctors’ groups and abortion rights supporters have claimed a ban on counselling women trespasses on the doctor-patient relationship, pointing out abortion services are not currently taxpayer funded.

“The notion that you would withhold information from a patient does not uphold or preserve their dignity,” said Jessica Marcella of the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association, which represents family planning clinics.

“I cannot imagine a scenario in which public health groups would allow this effort to go unchallenged.”

However, opponents of abortion claim federal family planning programmes effectively subsidise the abortion services provided by organisations like Planned Parenthood.

“Abortion is not healthcare or birth control and many women want natural healthcare choices, rather than hormone-induced changes,” said Kristan Hawkins of Students for Life of America.

Title X serves around 4 million American women each year through clinics, at a cost to taxpayers of about $260m (£190m).

The Republican-led Congress has unsuccessfully tried to deny federal funds to Planned Parenthood, and the Trump administration has previously promised religious and social conservatives that it would keep up the effort.

Additional reporting by AP

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in