Trump 'relinquishes moral high ground' by pardoning war criminals, US military officials say
Some officials spoke anonymously, others fired shots on Twitter
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Current and former US military officials are speaking out against the president’s reported plan to pardon a handful of war criminals on or around Memorial Day.
The Los Angeles Times spoke to a number of high-ranking officials who believe proposed pardons would not only be morally reprehensible, but put the US military at risk.
“If President Trump issues indiscriminate pardons of individuals accused — or convicted by their fellow service members — of war crimes, he relinquishes the United States’ moral high ground and undermines the good order and discipline critical to winning on the battlefield,” retired Gen. Charles Krulak, a former commandant of the Marine Corps, told the LA Times.
One senior officer currently serving in the Pentagon, who spoke under condition of anonymity, said many in his rank are “outraged” over the possible decision.
“I think a lot of us would see it in the same way — that it’s just awful,” the officer said.
Retired Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was explicit in his disapproval in a tweet sent on Tuesday.
“Absent evidence of innocence or injustice, the wholesale pardon of U.S. service members accused of war crimes signals our troops and allies that we don’t take the law of armed conflict seriously,” Mr Dempsey’s tweet read.
“Bad message. Bad precedent,” the tweet continued. “Abdication of moral responsibility. Risk to us.”
The New York Times reported on Friday that Donald Trump was likely planning to pardon several US military officers charged with committing war crimes, including murdering civilians and urinating on a corpse of a Taliban fighter.
Media Matters points out that Fox News has been calling for pardons for these officers, particularly Navy Special Operations Chief Edward Gallagher, Army Major Mathew Golsteyn, former Blackwater contractor Nicholas Slatten, for at least the last six months.
It was also revealed by the Daily Beast that Fox News host Pete Hegseth had been privately lobbying the president to get the war criminals pardoned, which was never disclosed to the public.
Mr Hegseth responded to the article by tweeting it out along with hashtags supporting the pardons.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments