Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Texas joined by 17 red states in Supreme Court lawsuit to overturn Trump’s election defeat

President has thrown his weight behind case and called it ‘the big one’

Graeme Massie
Los Angeles
Wednesday 09 December 2020 21:55 GMT
Comments
Related Video: Trump doubles down on false claim he 'won two' elections
Leer en Español

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Texas has been joined by 17 other red states in its longshot Supreme Court lawsuit to try and overturn Donald Trump’s election defeat.

Texas attorney general Ken Paxton launched legal action against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which were all won by Joe Biden as he claimed the White House.

The 17 states, all of which supported the outgoing president, have now filed an amicus brief in support of the case to throw out Mr Biden’s wins in those four states.

Mr Paxton claims that the Covid-related changes to election procedures in the states violated federal law, and he wants the US Supreme Court to block those states in the electoral college.

It is the latest legal effort by supporters of the outgoing president to try and help him cling to power.

But lawyers and backers of the president have suffered a long string of defeats in courtrooms across the country in their attempts to deny Mr Biden his legal victory.

The amicus brief was led by Missouri, according to reports.

Other states whose attorney generals signed on include Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia.

In his lawsuit filed to the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Mr Paxton claimed that the four states broke the law by changing their election policies and allowed voter fraud to take place.

He also asked the country’s highest court to push back the 14 December deadline for states to appoint their presidential electors.

“That deadline, however, should not cement a potentially illegitimate election result in the middle of this storm,” wrote lawyers for Texas.

Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has rejected the claim.

"The allegations in the lawsuit are false and irresponsible," said Georgia's deputy secretary of state, Jordan Fuchs.

"Texas alleges that there are 80,000 forged signatures on absentee ballots in Georgia, but they don’t bring forward a single person who this happened to. That’s because it didn’t happen.”

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel dismissed Paxton's suit as "a publicity stunt”.

"Mr. Paxton’s actions are beneath the dignity of the office of Attorney General and the people of the great state of Texas," she said.

Earlier this week the Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit that wanted mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania thrown out.

Mr Trump has thrown his support behind the lawsuit and called it “the big one”.

“We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case. This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!” Mr Trump wrote on Twitter.

Last month it was reported that the FBI was investigating allegations of abuse of office against of Mr Paxton.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in